Why does a Defender have to be devoid of modern technology for it to remain iconic? Sure, there are a lot of gimmicks around today but there are also a lot of genuinely useful technologies that people should absolutely be able to expect in a $60k car. The inclusions of those innovations doesn't have to come at the expense of its historical credentials.
Lane departure warnings, blind spot monitoring, radar cruise control, collision avoidance, queue assist, reversing cameras, terrain response, tyre pressure sensors, hill descent assistance, full mobile phone connectivity - all things I scoffed at until I experienced them. What made these things great wasn't that they were technologically advanced, it was that they were simple, unobtrusive and totally complementary to the driving experience. You barely knew they were there, until they became incredibly useful in some way.
I recently drove a Volvo XC60 for a period of time as a rental and it came standard with a lot of the features above, I thoroughly enjoyed it (I never thought I'd say that about a Volvo). I'd gladly accept any or all of these things in the Defender replacement. Heck, I'd settle for regular old cruise control. It should also have lots of airbags, because that's just a bloody good idea
I love my Defender and I don't think I'll ever part with it, but times have changed for the better and the new car should absolutely embrace that. That isn't a betrayal, it's progress which is key to the Defender's future success.
Bookmarks