Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 53

Thread: Sway Bars

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,827
    Total Downloaded
    0
    From my experience in addition to the mentioned fitment variations from factory.
    Re: articulation reduction with swaybars.
    IMO Perspective needs to be had here.
    Any concerns about reduced articulation should be considered against any suspension mods and serious regular low range work. Ive watched some spend poorly on suspension choice and remove swaybars only to achieve the same level of articulation as the original suspension with swaybars. But it looked cool a few inches taller.

    For the most part IMO 95% of 4wd in any make would be lucky to see more than 100km of genuine low range and max articulation in their lifetime and for most folks, concerns about articulation loss are typically never realised, however, some owners feel more confident by having removed swaybars or fitting disconnects according to their planned use.
    So as already mentioned unless hard core all the time (which isnt typical for even remote travel around the country) sway bar removal or disconnects isnt worthwhile for most vehicles.

    Since the question was asked about fitting swaybars.
    Most important, as already mentioned, make sure shocks and springs are suited for intended main purpose and in good condition as the first priority.
    If you still arent happy then fit the bars.
    If at all worried about articulation leave them off.
    At the end of the day its always a compromise if you want the vehicle to perform brilliantly on either end of the spectrum.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sway bars are active almost all of the time, increasing the stiffness and harshness of the ride. The only comfort benefit to be had from them is when the wheels on both sides of the vehicle strike a bump or hollow of the same magnitude and duration, at the same time, for example, when hitting a speed bump or spoon drain dead on.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    At the end of the day the best thing for most offroaders who do both on road and off road is to have mild thickness swaybars, with or without disconnects.

    The absence of swaybars typically requires springs that are too stiff in double bump, and thick swaybars typically create too many discomfort and lack of flex issues.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    Make your own if you are cheap. It is not rocket science.
    Got any plans?
    I did make my own disconnects from ideas off the interweb, lost them both within 15min of driving.
    Same as this pic except thicker washer and welded on, guessing the cotter pin snapped.
    Oh and i'm not cheap, just can't justify $2000 for sway bars

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The function sway bar is to reduce body roll but also it can be used to tune steering.

    MY puma defender comes with both front and rear sway bar. The front sway bar is significantly stronger than the rear. These produces understeering.I removed both sway bars and the under steer gets a bit better....

    As mentioned away bar is to reduce body roll but the cons is that it connects both wheels. When driving on gravel road with potholes, the sway bar will transmit the hit on one wheel to the other and produce a bit of a waddling movement like a crab/penguin, which is very scary at high speed...
    I remove both away bars and now I can drive over potoles at high speed comfortably.......(probably at around 80km/h

    Yes an affordable sway bar disconnect would be nice
    Cheers

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just to add, if both wheels will hit sped bump/pothole, the sway bar won't produce the waddling effect but only when one wheel hit bump/pothole. Because the sway bar will in effect compress one spring

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you drive like an old lady you have the option of soft coils and stiffer swaybars, because you are less likely to bottom the suspension.

    If you drive hard over undulating terrain you need firmer coils to prevent bottoming, and because of the stiffer coils can run softer swaybars.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What’s wrong with some body roll? I never had a problem with my stock 82 RRC

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    What’s wrong with some body roll? I never had a problem with my stock 82 RRC
    Range Rover Classic rollover - YouTube

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,801
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rammypluge View Post
    Looks like the drivers intention was to roll it for TV, not to avoid the car. He went out wide and then whipped it back masterfully into a roll. Even if that rrc had double HD sway bars he could still roll it with that exact same move. There was so much grip! The sidewalls on those bouncing balloon tyres would have been rolling away from the rim.


    I suppose no way to know if the rrc in that vid had sway bars.

    It would be interesting to see how much influence tyre profile and pressures would have on this test.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!