Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 68

Thread: 225/95/R16 Anyone tried them?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    194
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm running the 225 grippers on tubed wolf rims with tubes. I've found 6, dirt cheap at $90 per tyre. I reckon they are brilliant. I've also got a brand new set of 255s geos in the shed not getting used; that's how good I think they are. I run them 40psi on road and 25psi off. It is the only option for 33 inch all terrain, that fits standard rim. They look perfect. IMHO sunnies and alloys don't suit a defender. 225s are the exact same height as 285s.. but much nicer to drive on and less wear on vehicle.

    I also have a Detroit. The 225s with Detroit, are much more capable than 255s or 285s muddies with standard open diff. What I'm saying is, it's cheaper, and better bang for buck, to get a Detroit and run these 225 tyres on standard rims, than get after market wheels, and 255 mud tyres and still have no locker..

    I've just lined up a set of brand new take offs, this time though duelers. I plan on running this size for a long time. Out of the following sizes: 235, 265,255 and 285 that I have tried, I think 225 are hands down best size for a standard defender. They also retain the most traditional/stock look.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    194
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here's how they look...notice they fit up under standard flares nicely too with articulation. These are on tubed wolfs, about +20 offset. And no mud up the side!!

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Warner Area - SEQ
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Landy Red View Post
    I'm running the 225 grippers on tubed wolf rims with tubes. I've found 6, dirt cheap at $90 per tyre. I reckon they are brilliant. I've also got a brand new set of 255s geos in the shed not getting used; that's how good I think they are. I run them 40psi on road and 25psi off. It is the only option for 33 inch all terrain, that fits standard rim. They look perfect. IMHO sunnies and alloys don't suit a defender. 225s are the exact same height as 285s.. but much nicer to drive on and less wear on vehicle.

    I also have a Detroit. The 225s with Detroit, are much more capable than 255s or 285s muddies with standard open diff. What I'm saying is, it's cheaper, and better bang for buck, to get a Detroit and run these 225 tyres on standard rims, than get after market wheels, and 255 mud tyres and still have no locker..

    I've just lined up a set of brand new take offs, this time though duelers. I plan on running this size for a long time. Out of the following sizes: 235, 265,255 and 285 that I have tried, I think 225 are hands down best size for a standard defender. They also retain the most traditional/stock look.
    That's good to know but for me I do not want to be running tubes as that brings back too many bad memories from early days of me running split rims and tube tyres...

    Great to hear that they go that well and the benefits of a Detroit rear...

    If I go this path, I'll be putting them on the standard 7" Disco steel rims or Alloy rims that I have in the shed... MY main concern though with that width of rim is when aired down, that u have a greater chance of rolling the tyre off the bead/rim...

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Warner Area - SEQ
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    I've got them on my Defender with 7" Disco 1 steel rims. Went up the Hay River Track in the Simpson earlier this year and had pressures down at around 14-15 lbs at times, no issues.
    So u have experienced no issues at low pressures of the bead coming away from the rim? What about when driving those more rutted tracks where the sidewall is pushing up against the ruts on difficult tracks? This is where I'm thinking u may have troubles of the tyre coming away from the bead more easily as the 225 tyre is roughly only 1.5" wider than the rim itself...

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    194
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The wolfs are 6.5 inch so bugger all difference really. I did have them on tubeless wolfs and took them to 18psi. A mate runs that set up and said he went to 10 and they were like caterpillar tracks! Honestly though I don't reckon that really low pressures are needed, because such a high tyre profile (95), means that as your air down the benefit of a longer contact patch is achieved more quickly (i.e without letting out as much air.) So, by going to 20, a lot of benefit in traction is achieved..where's I reckon a smaller profile, say a 75 series tyre would need to be let down more to achieve the same increase in contact patch. Would be interesting to test this theory!?

    I've got tubless wolfs with 255 tyres sitting in the shed, supposedly for tougher tracks, but then these 225s are just so surprisingly capable and they so skinny they aren't touching sides if ruts! Anyway, I'll probably sell the 255s and run the 225s on the tubless rims, but for now, with the driving I'm doing currently, tubes are fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Robmacca View Post
    That's good to know but for me I do not want to be running tubes as that brings back too many bad memories from early days of me running split rims and tube tyres...

    Great to hear that they go that well and the benefits of a Detroit rear...

    If I go this path, I'll be putting them on the standard 7" Disco steel rims or Alloy rims that I have in the shed... MY main concern though with that width of rim is when aired down, that u have a greater chance of rolling the tyre off the bead/rim...

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Gladstone, Qld
    Posts
    3
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Robmacca View Post
    So u have experienced no issues at low pressures of the bead coming away from the rim? What about when driving those more rutted tracks where the sidewall is pushing up against the ruts on difficult tracks? This is where I'm thinking u may have troubles of the tyre coming away from the bead more easily as the 225 tyre is roughly only 1.5" wider than the rim itself...
    The maximum rim width suitable for the 225/95R16 would likely be 7.0 inches (rim range of 5.5 - 7.0) considering a 235/85R16 can safely be fitted to a maximum rim width of 7.5 inches (rim range of 6.0 - 7.5).

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2023
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Standard series 3 steels

    Hi mate not sure whether this is an active convo but would these 225/95 r16 fit on my standard series 3 steels?? Currently it's got 7.5 16s on and I need new ones but a slightly newer wheel. Hope you can help!

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The thread's five years old, with the last post previous to yours, two years old, however your revival will probably reignite the conversation.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,028
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Joelholmesy View Post
    Hi mate not sure whether this is an active convo but would these 225/95 r16 fit on my standard series 3 steels?? Currently it's got 7.5 16s on and I need new ones but a slightly newer wheel. Hope you can help!
    Sure. A little taller and a little wider.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Mirboo North Victoria
    Posts
    457
    Total Downloaded
    0
    We are running the Toyota take offs on two vehicles, my daughters Series 3 Stage one and my Series 2A both vehicles are 109”. The V8 handles it no problem, we have taken it on some long trips and there seems to be no issues (15,000 kilometres so far).The Series 2A has only completed 700 or so miles so far, it does increase the height and I have noticed a difference regarding ratio. The Series 2A is a four cylinder petrol and as such doesn’t have the same power but it does seem to handle it ok.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!