Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Trayback 110 Defenders

  1. #11
    oldie is offline Fossicker Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Pennant Hills
    Posts
    99
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Trayback Defenders

    I bought my Defender 110 cab/chas with all steel tray fitted from ULR Melbourne, new in Jan 2011. It was invoiced as a cab/chas

    The tray was made in Melb by Top Deck and was separately invoiced.
    My understanding is that Defender utes - known as HCPUs were a factory supplied product and that trays were not a factory supplied option.

    Interesting, my 110 was built Sept 2009, is labelled MY2010 and I bought it brand new (29 km ) January 2011 but warranty was back dated to 29 September 2010 on the basis it was a Demonstrator. I only became aware of this in late 2010 when I claimed for some warranty work and was knocked back. But that is another story.


    Keith


    2016 Range Rover Sport HSE SDV6
    2013 Range Rover Sport SDV6 gone. Storm write off
    1999 Discovery II V8 gone sadly
    1984 RR V8 gone sadly
    Series III HCPU gone
    Series III Table top gone

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I
    Trayback four wheel drives have always been a niche product except in Australia, as far as I am aware.
    Indeed. When I sent a photo of my Series III to mike of Britannica Restorations fame he was over the moon. He'd not seen one in the UK or North America but had built one himself based on a Telstra unit he'd seen here.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Tote View Post
    There are many yards in rural NSW filled with Ranger and Hilux tubs where people have bought an upspec vehicle and pulled the tub off to fit a tray because only lower spec vehicles have a cab chassis option available.

    Regrds,
    Tote
    That turns into a racket, in much the same way upgrading wheels to aftermarket ones does. The dealer charges full whack for the new bits and then keeps the other bits, which the buyer has paid for. and then sells them on. Course, wheels are easier to shift than ute tubs.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  4. #14
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just as a followup on this thread, my memory suggests that here the changeover from utes to traybacks started in the mid sixties, and within a decade had become the norm for working utilities, including four wheel drives.

    My theory is that it was the result of the spread of forklifts in use by hardware and rural supply retailers, so that the tradesman or farmer could get a pallet of supplies instead of having to load packages small enough to handle by one or two workers. It is a lot easier to load and unload a flat tray with forklift than it is a ute.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    It is a lot easier to load and unload a flat tray with forklift than it is a ute.
    It certainly is, and without the intrusion of the wheel arches the tray can hold considerably more.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Usually somewhere
    Posts
    2,934
    Total Downloaded
    22.04 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    It certainly is, and without the intrusion of the wheel arches the tray can hold considerably more.
    Depends on how you look at it. A trayback can hold more if the load is to a set footprint like a pallet and cannot fit between the wheel arches. However, I went the other way. I went from a trayback to a 110 HCPU so I could reduce the centre of gravity of my load. This in turn allowed me to carry more firewood in the rough with a lower centre of gravity. I also happily carry a 1000 litre tank of water in the HCPU between the wheels in the rough whereas I would not put such a load on a trayback and go where I go with that much water sitting above the wheels of a trayback configuration. It is very much a Horses for courses thing.

    I think the biggest advantage I see of a trayback (having had one previously) is all around 270 degree access to the load so if you are a tradie and carry different things at the same time you don't have to lift anything heavy over anything else to get to it. This is the only drawback I have using the HCPU fitted. Heavy or awkward stuff I have to stack at the tailgate end of the deck to get ready access. A minor point in my case. If I am carrying a lot of heavy stuff a lot of the time I also have a truck crane I have adapted to fit into the HCPU. I made the centre spinning pedestal and supporting framework and then use the top part of my garage engine crane onto this to lift big stuff on and off.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!