 ChatterBox
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						ChatterBox
					
					
						SupporterYes it's the wrong way to compensate for road camber, the driver's side is set higher to compensate for the (assumed) usual sole occupancy, as well as the extra weight involved in the controls.
 Swaggie
					
					
						Swaggie
					
					
						My 76 RRC also had different length left and right front springs for driver weight compensation.
MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa
Yes. Most Landrovers have had different L/R springs. This is almost inevitable if you want to have long travel suspension with no or weak sway bars, and want the vehicle to sit level at normal load.
Most cars have so little suspension travel and/or strong sway bars as to make this unnecessary, as they are optimised for handling on road rather than offroad.
Series Landrovers had their empty weight concentrated on the driver's side (especially RHD) with the driver, fuel tank, battery transfer case, steering gear, pedal gear (and on some the spare) on that side. The engine/gearbox/radiator is offset the other way, but it is not far off centre.
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
I did a mechanic apprenticeship at a Mazda dealer in 1979 onwards and worked in a couple of Toyota dealerships before I left that trade, it was a standard thing on everything from a little Mazda 800, corolla etc upwards, the driver's side spring was set a little taller than the passenger side. Don't know if this is still the case, I'm out of date there like everywhere else.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks