Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Safety Alert!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gladstone, Queensland
    Posts
    471
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Safety Alert!

    For those of you with the new 07 MY defenders I think you should check this out.

    Defender2 - View topic - ***URGENT BRAKE ISSUE***

    Could save your life.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Surely that should be reason for a recall.

    I've seen recalls by Holden and Toyota for far more trivial things than that.

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Not quite as bad as it could be - isn't that the vacuum line? Should give poor brakes not no brakes.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    certainly looks like a vacuum line---
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,131
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    If the Defender brakes are anything like the D2 brakes, then no vacuum is as good as no brakes - and I dont mean there is some braking... its just about no brakes at all.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,445
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I saw this and had a gander at mine.

    All is attached and lots of room between the shield and the pipes.

    I'll be keeping an eye on it though.
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  7. #7
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by one_iota View Post
    I saw this and had a gander at mine.

    All is attached and lots of room between the shield and the pipes.

    I'll be keeping an eye on it though.
    Wot 'e sed
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dm_td5 View Post
    Wot 'e sed

    .....x2
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mark2 View Post
    Surely that should be reason for a recall.

    I've seen recalls by Holden and Toyota for far more trivial things than that.
    Not exactly,Toyota had to recall Prado's because the flange on the diff's weren't welded on causing the rear hub assembly to come off,then they recalled them a second time because the front lower control arm balljoint that holds the front wheels on failed and the cruisers were because the bolts that hold the brake rotors on weren't torqued up,just loose and the Prius catch on fire and the steering columns were ''burnt'' during heat treatment so they snapped so having a vacuum pipe on the defender fail causing a stiff pedal is not quite in the same league. Pat

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Not exactly,Toyota had to recall Prado's because the flange on the diff's weren't welded on causing the rear hub assembly to come off,then they recalled them a second time because the front lower control arm balljoint that holds the front wheels on failed and the cruisers were because the bolts that hold the brake rotors on weren't torqued up,just loose and the Prius catch on fire and the steering columns were ''burnt'' during heat treatment so they snapped so having a vacuum pipe on the defender fail causing a stiff pedal is not quite in the same league. Pat
    I dont quite follow your logic.

    What about this?





    Problem:The engine may missfire in heavy rainMake:ToyotaModel:
    Prius NHW20



    Date Range:01/08/03 - 14/10/03VIN Ranges:see fileStatus:Inactive Defect:Heavy rain or frequent car washing may cause water to pass the hood seal into the engine compartment in some cases affecting electrical components.Consequences:The engine may missfire or activate the fail-safe mode. In these conditions the vehicle will fail the mandatory ADR emission standardCorrective action:Toyota dealers will fit an additional seal to the underside of the hood.Notif. Date:2/08/2004DOTARS No.:
    R04/099


    or this?


    Problem:Faulty stop lamp circuit.Make:ToyotaModel:
    Lexus RX330, Prius NHW20


    Date Range:October 2002 - July 2004VIN Ranges:see fileStatus:Inactive Defect:Silicon oxide may be generated on the surface of the contact point.Consequences:Oxidisation may cause a resistence in the circuit causing stop lamp to become inoperative.Corrective action:All vehicles involved will have the switch replaced.Notif. Date:23/11/2004DOTARS No.:
    R04/153

    or this?

    Problem:BRAKE BOOSTER FAILUREMake:TOYOTAModel:
    Camry
    Variant:
    SV20, SV21



    Date Range:1987-1988VIN Ranges:(SV 20) 9000001, 9001988 (SV 21) 0000001, 9021763Status:Inactive Defect:Defect in centre plate seal in ISO-VAC brake booster (supplied by BCIA exclusively for Toyota Camry).Problem occurs intermittently without warning.Consequences:May lead to loss of vacuum assistance during brake operation.Corrective action:Inspect and replace defective brake boosters.Notif. Date:22/04/1988DOTARS No.:
    R88/021

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!