Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: td5 or new 4 cyl which is better

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's the hills driving that kills my mileage. We live on the other side of the Adelaide Hills from Adelaide, so every trip to town is up and over, via Mt Lofty, and then down to Adelaide. Over 1/2 a KM of vertical upping and downing each time.

    On a flat highway trip they both get a lot better.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,466
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scallops View Post
    I dunno, I got 9.4km per 100 driving around Australia - 800 kg plus on board, stuff all over the roof, driving across 2 deserts in 2nd gear with the diff locked and the tyres at 16 psi!
    How fast was your average speed? I bet that 6th gear is what is helping the most though. The td5 in 5th at 100k is turning 2500
     2005 Defender 110 

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    How fast was your average speed? I bet that 6th gear is what is helping the most though. The td5 in 5th at 100k is turning 2500
    Average speed I don't know (varied so much depending on place) - but I rarely, if ever, drive at over 90km/h - perfect in 6th gear.
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,466
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scallops View Post
    Average speed I don't know (varied so much depending on place) - but I rarely, if ever, drive at over 90km/h - perfect in 6th gear.
    That would be a big help. I've noticed my consumption goes up substantially the faster you drive. Defender aero drag isn't great.

    At 110 it's about 11-11.5 l/100. At 100 it drops to 10.5. On one trip there was a football night and we were racing to get to Tennant Creek and we were doing 120+ into a big headwind and we scored about 15l/100 - our record. I've never tried 90 for long enough to get a result I do prefer to travel at around 100 as the noise level is still pleasant. At over 110 for long periods it gets a bit much
     2005 Defender 110 

  5. #25
    awest130 Guest
    thanks all, plenty of pros and cons to mull over some more! on a sidenote what is vnt??

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    vairable nozzle turbo.

    cheers phil

  7. #27
    skip2102 Guest
    Seems to me that those with TD5's arn't going to "dis" their motor - so their votes are going with the TD5. Those who've bought the Puma aren't going to admit the old motors better...

    All I can offer is that my 09 Puma is everything I expected and more, a defender that does 120km all day at 10L/100kms and can actually overtake up hills! All this and it can still perform better off road stock than my D8 work Troopy! I'm one happy camper....

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I bought my wife a new PUMA (lots of kids + 7 seats = good), and I kept my Td5. So I drive both regularly.

    There is nothing like a warranty for taking away worries about minor noises. My Puma's spent 3 months of it's first 6 months in the workshop for a variety of issues, but this did not cost a cent.. (Well I suppose lost depreciation, lack of use... Mmm PErhaps it did cost me a heap...) But anyway, the teething problems seem to be over.. Although it's booked in to get a rusty bulkhead repaired soon.

    Driving wise - the PUMA wins hands down. It's so much more powerful, that the TD5. The seats are nicer. It's cleaner, there's no permanent texta marks on the hoodlining where the kids got to it.. etc. A new car always beats an old car in driving experience. However the TD5 has no sway bars and seems to handle articulation better than the PUMA, also it has softer suspension offroad. The PUMA's traction control is smoother however, seems to "pulse" a lot quicker than the TD5. So for a pure offroader - I think the TD5 has slightly better potential - barring the better TC in the PUMA.

    The deciding factor for me would be the warranty. I just spent $2000 having the TD5's roof reattached and braced where the corner frames popped out + a heap of other minor repairs. Then earlier in the year another 2.5k on something else I don't remember. And now the clutch has started juddering. I spend on average 7k a year keeping the old TD5 on the road. So a new car with a warranty is the go unless you can do the repairs yourself.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This post is the side by side I did of them and it was pre tombie Oh-My-God-when-did-I-get-a-saturn-5-installed chip.

    I still stand by the final comment

    Quote Originally Posted by ME
    This is the civilised defender. Its the one you buy when you have to buy a utiltarian landrover that the wife needs to drive.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!