Scatter-gun argument, nice. Why make a point when you can make 15 irrelevant ones?
Hydrocarbon fuels are the things we won't need, ya peanut. You buy a lot more fuel than car when operating a vehicle over its life. C'mon, it's pretty simple.
Printable View
Scatter-gun argument, nice. Why make a point when you can make 15 irrelevant ones?
Hydrocarbon fuels are the things we won't need, ya peanut. You buy a lot more fuel than car when operating a vehicle over its life. C'mon, it's pretty simple.
The embodied emissions of a car can rival the exhaust pipe emissions over its entire lifetime.
New cars should absolutley be EV, no more ICE. I said that a few posts up.
But if you are buying a new vehicle every few years for emissions/range/technology improvements you are probably doing far more damage than the old guy who decides to drive his banger to the grave.
I don't think that industrial chemists snort pixie dust, but can convert their refineries to make whatever product is in demand. That could be durable consumer goods such as lightweight vehicle components, or even single use plastic bags if that is where the demand is. They could even buy less crude oil if demand dropped enough, who knows.
I'll just leave this video here
https://www.facebook.com/extremetube...5380382572217/
"Tesla-powered electric dune buggy accelerate shockingly fast in sand
With a rated peak power capacity of 475 kW (636 HP), it has to make the ‘Tesla Sand Truck’ one of the most powerful electric dune vehicles out there."
Imagine if the battery packs required to push a camry 400km became small enough and as cheap to buy as say, an old 95 camry. The second hand ICE market would largly become a buy to convert market. I would love to see this happen.
If conversions were then pushed by media and government as a good choice for the sake of enviromental impact and benefits to small/medium businesses in Australia...... we would be dreaming!