Page 230 of 427 FirstFirst ... 130180220228229230231232240280330 ... LastLast
Results 2,291 to 2,300 of 4269

Thread: EV general discussion

  1. #2291
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,458
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Homestar View Post
    They should be using one of these as their demo vehicles then because what I drove made me run a mile. It says something about 'Murican manufacturing quality when the Chinese built units are far superior...
    Yeah.. it's one of those things.. The cars get out there.. people whinge.. more people whinge.. the factory says "ok we better do something".. they get someone to cook a fix.. and by the time the parts actually get through and put on a car.. six months is really pretty fast. Given the shipping issues no car in Aus would have had this before probably late Feb. I'll admit the car we drove on the test drive seemed ok, but then they pretty much tell you where you can drive. It's short and the roads are smooth and frankly you're pretty highly loaded with new stuff. Suspension is the kind of thing you have to drive around for a bit.

    As to quality.. I'm in all the Tesla user groups. The common theme is "when will my car get here". "I've got a screw in my tyre". "How do I charge my car". It's refreshing to not see "my car is rubbish and keeps breaking". "This thing has failed like all the others".

    It's early days yet but it's promising. I've had legacy cars that had already got off to a solid start at disassembling themselves by week three.
     2005 Defender 110 

  2. #2292
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,246
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Life cycle emissions study

    Life cycle emissions looks clearly in favor and will get even better as mining sector gets cleaned up with small nuclear power and hydrogen.
    "Electricity production is by far the most emission-intensive stage in a BEVs life cycle. Decarbonizing the electricity sector by implementing renewable and nuclear energy sources can significantly reduce these vehicles’ use phase emissions."

    Power sector here in OZ is anti nuclear idiots still of course 😭😭😔Life Cycle Emissions: EVs vs. Combustion Engine Vehicles

  3. #2293
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,458
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NavyDiver View Post
    Life cycle emissions looks clearly in favor and will get even better as mining sector gets cleaned up with small nuclear power and hydrogen.
    "Electricity production is by far the most emission-intensive stage in a BEVs life cycle. Decarbonizing the electricity sector by implementing renewable and nuclear energy sources can significantly reduce these vehicles’ use phase emissions."

    Power sector here in OZ is anti nuclear idiots still of course 😭😭😔Life Cycle Emissions: EVs vs. Combustion Engine Vehicles
    The thing is - if you buy an EV now.. it's only going to get better environmentally as our grid decarbonises. If you buy an ICE engined vehicle - it's not going to change. It's going to keep burning fuel until it's scrapped.

    It would appear to me that it's a polarising subject. There is a lot of things that people don't understand, and there is a lot of poor or downright misleading information being put out there. Also, EV's and charging infrastructure are making large leaps continually. IMHO if your current car doesn't need replacing - keep driving it. That's the best outcome. If it does need replacement and it's role can be done by an EV then have a solid look and see if one will meet your needs. If it works for you - get the EV.

    After one month (tomorrow) of EV ownership - the family is stoked with our choice. It does everything we need and it's supremely comfortable. It's a great bit of gear and is really next level in so many ways. That's the pay off.. they are really comfortable and convenient cars.

    The surprises have been how efficient it is. The sticker said 160 wh/k and the long term average is turning out to be less than 140. Drove from Yarraman to home (north side BNE) yesterday (168k) with an average of 114wh/100.
     2005 Defender 110 

  4. #2294
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    While people say the charging infrastructure is going ahead, I don’t see this anywhere I go. I live in the 6th largest City in Victoria and we have 1 (broken) ev charger and no plans for any more according to Council, so if you live outside of Metro Melbourne you just seem to be **** out of luck. I’ve got better things to do with my time than plan where I need to go in the hope there’s a working ev charger when I get there.

    It’s just too damn hard at the moment - I’m thinking another 10 years yet before there’s a decent network and that’s if there’s enough power to go around.

    I work with an Electrical mob that install Tesla charging stations and they cost millions each for around 10 chargers as new switchboards, HV subs and miles of cabling are needed for each one. How long is this business model going to work for Tesla before they stop building them?
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  5. #2295
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    The thing is - if you buy an EV now.. it's only going to get better environmentally as our grid decarbonises. If you buy an ICE engined vehicle - it's not going to change. It's going to keep burning fuel until it's scrapped.

    It would appear to me that it's a polarising subject. There is a lot of things that people don't understand, and there is a lot of poor or downright misleading information being put out there. Also, EV's and charging infrastructure are making large leaps continually. IMHO if your current car doesn't need replacing - keep driving it. That's the best outcome. If it does need replacement and it's role can be done by an EV then have a solid look and see if one will meet your needs. If it works for you - get the EV.

    After one month (tomorrow) of EV ownership - the family is stoked with our choice. It does everything we need and it's supremely comfortable. It's a great bit of gear and is really next level in so many ways. That's the pay off.. they are really comfortable and convenient cars.

    The surprises have been how efficient it is. The sticker said 160 wh/k and the long term average is turning out to be less than 140. Drove from Yarraman to home (north side BNE) yesterday (168k) with an average of 114wh/100.
    It’s Carbon shifting, not decarbonisation.

    Agree that any vehicle that suits a users needs is a good car.
    Benefit of EV ride over same size bodies is mass, they’re significantly heavier which improves comfort.

    I did a quick back of envelope calculation the other day around increased mass on roads - which greatly contributes to wear and tear - and it’s significant. As EVs become dominant we will see increased road surface wear, and increased maintenance requirements.

    Increased tyre consumption will be a side effect of heavier for size vehicles.

    The emissions aren’t being reduced in any way by EVs with current tech.

  6. #2296
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Homestar View Post
    While people say the charging infrastructure is going ahead, I don’t see this anywhere I go. I live in the 6th largest City in Victoria and we have 1 (broken) ev charger and no plans for any more according to Council, so if you live outside of Metro Melbourne you just seem to be **** out of luck. I’ve got better things to do with my time than plan where I need to go in the hope there’s a working ev charger when I get there.

    It’s just too damn hard at the moment - I’m thinking another 10 years yet before there’s a decent network and that’s if there’s enough power to go around.

    I work with an Electrical mob that install Tesla charging stations and they cost millions each for around 10 chargers as new switchboards, HV subs and miles of cabling are needed for each one. How long is this business model going to work for Tesla before they stop building them?

    Fully agree at one level. The roll out is slow. The Camperdown and Geelong CCS chargers in Western Vic are game changes for my short range quirky one. It was going to be sold about now. I am happy to wait for a MUCH better option now with my cheap ev

    DID I say how much I hate TELSA chargers I have driven past for the last few years Ford and GM deal with my nemesis may make Mr Musk devious plan work for Tesla share holder at last? In the US only of course. I am at work honestly. Proof attachedIMG20230626153333.jpg its 32 right nowRiding a scooter tonight so NO beer in hand

  7. #2297
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,139
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    It’s Carbon shifting, not decarbonisation.

    Agree that any vehicle that suits a users needs is a good car.
    Benefit of EV ride over same size bodies is mass, they’re significantly heavier which improves comfort.

    I did a quick back of envelope calculation the other day around increased mass on roads - which greatly contributes to wear and tear - and it’s significant. As EVs become dominant we will see increased road surface wear, and increased maintenance requirements.

    Increased tyre consumption will be a side effect of heavier for size vehicles.

    The emissions aren’t being reduced in any way by EVs with current tech.
    You don't have to worry about Ev's damaging the roads, the trucks are doing that already.
    2005 D3 TDV6 Present
    1999 D2 TD5 Gone

  8. #2298
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RANDLOVER View Post
    You don't have to worry about Ev's damaging the roads, the trucks are doing that already.
    Yes. Light vehicles are responsible for an insignificant proportion of road damage compared to trucks, especially on major roads. (There may be some increase on roads that rarely see trucks, but have a lot of cars, such as some suburban "rat runs", but these would be pretty rare.

    The reason for this is that damage to roads is proportional to axle load - and axle load of trucks is way higher than the axle load of even the heaviest EVs. Even worse, damage is probably more closely proportional to the square of axle load.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #2299
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RANDLOVER View Post
    You don't have to worry about Ev's damaging the roads, the trucks are doing that already.
    Yeah, but trucks pay a LOT in rego for the privilege of doing this - ours at work are just over $10K a year each to register. Maybe EV rego should go up in line with this?
    Last edited by Homestar; 27th June 2023 at 09:32 AM.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  10. #2300
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As mentioned trucks do add a lot of wear and are charged accordingly.

    However, on suburban roads, where damage is obvious, it’s a product of cars. Rarely is a HV seen in these areas.

    Any increase in mass will add to degradation, it has to. So increasing the average weight of ALL road going vehicles does has a compounding effect.

    To claim otherwise and blame trucks as the sole cause is nonsense.



    In all this current nonsense, the only winner is the car manufacturers.

    No emissions are reduced - simply relocated.

    Price exceeds equivalent fuel burn cost for average life of vehicle. Payback on an EV for my mother vs a petrol version exceeds her predicted life expectancy!

    And the most significant impact - take a look at where some of the materials for your “clean” batteries come from and the human cost. If it wasn’t mined in such a perverse manner of rights abuse and payment - nobody could afford to buy one.

    Nope - these EVs in their current form are an absolute disaster. Meeting a trend in the West whilst only fixing localised problems at the detriment of greater issues.

Page 230 of 427 FirstFirst ... 130180220228229230231232240280330 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!