Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Hyundai Ends Development of Internal Combustion Engines

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Phideaux View Post
    * and if carbon is used to produce hydrogen - uh, duh?
    Why doesn't your duh? apply to EVs? In 2020 Australia produced 378.7 PJ of overall renewable energy (including renewable electricity) in 2018, which accounted for 6.2% of Australia's total energy use (6,146 PJ), so the vast amount of energy EVs consume comes from coal or other carbon sources. ( source the infamous WiKi )

    This stuff is in its infancy. Maybe we'll go with both. Maybe some new tech will come along. It's far too soon to come down on one side at the exclusion of everything else. However, it's possibly easier to implement hydrogen using currently existing infrastructure. We did it with LPG for decades.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  2. #12
    BradC is online now Super Moderator
    No one of consequence
    Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Perth (near Malaga)
    Posts
    3,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Phideaux View Post
    And the big winner with BEVs (including [theoretically, eventually] Hydrogen fuel-cell - [I don't fully understand this tech]) is their running costs. Even at today's inflated prices, BEVs break even at 10 years just on maintenance costs - many fewer moving parts.
    10 years is good timing as that’s when a good majority of them will be ready for the shredder. So they barely break even before the tech is both obsoleted and uneconomical to re-cell. As you say “winner”. EV is a short term solution to a long term problem, but hey it makes people feel environmentally conscious while still contributing to the problem.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Break even on cost. Not on impact.
    The environmental and human costs of all RAMs etc required far exceeds benefit.

    And to move to electric storage - well we simply cannot make enough

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!