Printable View
But there's all the ones running around without this that are still 2 stars.Quote:
Originally Posted by cripesamighty
They only added the safety pack from the absolute trashing they got from the worlds media - they don't actually give a stuff about its safety, if they did, they would have included it from the start...
Look at John Cadogan's YouTube page if you want to see what he thinks of executives from certain car companies. Quite inventive language!!
And if Ford had used the Falcon platform for the Mustang this thread wouldn't have started. The "Dunnydore" is the best RWD platform in GM's universe, by far.Quote:
Originally Posted by LandyAndy
Well, my thoughts on the Mustang are well known, and they stand, but I do acknowledge that Ford only have themselves to blame for the Ancap rating, however IMHO, here are many on this forum who wouldn't buy a Mustang even if it had an Ancap rating of 5M.
Nevertheless, none of this is affecting the worldwide success that the new Mustang has been for Ford, and also in Australia, where our demand for such vehicles is miniscule, albeit relative to the world market.
Nevertheless, in Aussie, despite Anscap, sales are going very well, the Mustang is now Australia's best selling sportscat, sales increasing 78.2% in 2017.
Would I buy one, well I might, but I wouldn't be happy with the standard product. I'd be going straight to Herrod who have the Aussie rights to Ford motorsport upgrades, & I'd have 'ém fit their blower, driveline, suspension & brake upgrade, with full Ford warranty (different rules for aftermarket re emissions etc), and the finished product is still cheaper than the HSV product of which I've also owned a few,...gotta love my V8s.
In the meantime, whilst Wifey likes the Mustang, she prefers her RS3, and I ain't selling Gracie, so I can't see one in our garage!
Pickles.
So what you're saying is they are a lump of junk that you then need to spend 10's of '000 of dollars on to make it right?
Hmmm, I'll pass... ;)
But I'm being facetious - sales are indeed going nuts - up to over 1,350 units in May alone up from 630 something. We actually did look at one for SWMBO but it wasn't for us. They are a good looking car though. :)
Lol!!......."lump of junk......." Can't see where I said that Gav.Quote:
Originally Posted by Homestar
Some people are happy with 306KW,...but for the relatively reasonable price of obtaining 500KW, in spite of me being old, I would enjoy it, I REALLY would.
I don't thnk I've ever driven anything over 400KW, so 500KW would be a new experience for me!....but to quote you "ït ain't for us",......not at this time anyway!
Pickles.
Reckon it would be fun for a month or two, and then the poor build and ergonomics would pall. In the US it's cheap, in the UK it's even cheaper, in a relative sense, but here? Way, way too dear. I'd much rather find a low k XR6 Turbo, or the last XR8 with the GT engine. They even disabled the "drift" function here! Seems that was really the only point of 500KW in a chassis as crude as that. Oh, and then there's the absolutely pitiful size of the fuel tank.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickles2
On the "sales success" thing, well, of course. Ford haven't had a hero car really since the first XR6Ts and Typhoons. The last HSVs are mind blowing, so Ford fans need some sort of cred. As a bloke who fell for Beechey's Mustang, and then that insane car of Moff's, I'm there. But this 'Stang is a disappointment to me. They could have done something truly special, and if they'd used the Falcon platform they would have.. Sure, if you watch the opening scenes of Episode One of the Grand Tour, you will see what the tuning houses can do with them, but the price here of one of those puts you in not very old M5 territory. And THAT would be no contest.
It's been mentioned here, and on another thread, that it's ridiculous to carry on about poor ANCAP scores, when we drive around in old Land Rovers. At best, that is a spurious argument. My 2000 Disco was never going to score a 5. What car of that era was? Did the S Class Benz? I dunno, it isn't relevant. The 2017 Disco scored a 5. The 2017 'Stang should have as well. The Falcon they could have based it on does. Not good enough, Ford.
Regardless of the ancap rating I wouldn't knock one of these Mustangs back, Would be great Fun to drive [biggrin]
Well that's it,..."Fun",....that's what it would be for me,...absolutely,......just as our 90 Gracie is,..fun,.....one has 90KW, and one has 306 KW,.....but they're both "fun" to me......couldn't drive either as an "ëverydayer"Quote:
Originally Posted by trout1105
Pickles..
Hawaii is Mustang heaven.
Everywhere you look there are new Mustangs mostly convertibles. mostly top down.
They look great, they sound great.
I hope Ford see fit to market them at a realistic price here as they are stateside. My wife likes them, I like them, perhaps when she retires and doesnt need a shopping trolley we may look at one.