Page 34 of 55 FirstFirst ... 24323334353644 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 543

Thread: Y62 patrol

  1. #331
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Y62 patrol

    Brakes - known
    Front CVs - known
    Strange harmonic 70-90km/h - known
    Lack of honouring of factory warranty by Nissan - very well known.

    Arduous use service schedule is surprising!

    I was surprised to read the other day - no SLS and Nissan say no WDH is to be used with the Patrol...

    I’ll have to upload my TCO spreadsheet one day.


    In your case - the Y62 is viable simply because of a Lease...
    Im on the FB group amd the 62 forum and the only known cv breakage i am aware of was in a supercharged and lifted truck on 35s.
    Ive looked pretty hard for issues and theres not much at all in repeat breakages.

    Honestly on the forum theres nothing doing its boring.....no one ever reports anything as broken

  2. #332
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,543
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1nando View Post
    JC i 100% agree and i think that anyone who has followed this thread would appreciate that i have been fair in my analysis of the y62 and not biased. I dont for a second believe its better off road than a defender or a d4. Its probably better in the sand than both but thats what it was designed to do and becuase it has decent tyres on it.
    The y62 has impressed me in a lot of ways. Working with trucks day in and day out had basically led me to believe that diesel was the way to go for everything you'd expect from a hd vehicle but i took a risk on my boss's recommendation and went with a y62. I really like the driving experience and effortless power on offer but i don't love it like i used to love my 110. The patrol is like a mistress I'd imagine (not that id know from 1st hand experience). Its like a guilty little pleasure. Its goes hard when you need it to, comfotable and gentle when not pushing it, always relaible but i just don't love it. Its reliable, seems unbreakable but no matter how hard i try to love it i just don't. I got blasted for saying a y62 wouldnt be as good offroad as a defender on the patrol forum and as a result i spend no time on that forum and all of it here. I make statements based on 1st hand experience and things i learn along the way. The Patrol has been a fantastic learning experience.

    I think the defenders ability to be transformed/modified into something personal is what makes it special.

    I love LRs and don't want to offend or upset anyone.
    It's all good, I'm coming due to replace my D4 and this thread has given me cause to re-evaluate the Y62 and a few others. I looked at the Y62 when I was searching for a new car last time but was turned off by what I thought was a too high price (it has come down a lot since then), a compromised Arab interior (the D4 is nicer and better laid out IMO) and an exterior that I still can't really think of as better than butt ugly. I do like the drivetrain and ability to run decent diameter tyres.
    This time around it has dropped of my list due to the lack of towing software now I have a large van, the physical size and the interior. Also it appears that is considerably thirstier than the D4 V8 when towing from what i have read. As the only time I pay for fuel is when I tow my van this is a consideration.

    I've looked at the L322 TDV8 and V8SC but the 250kg tow ball weight and very limited GVM has ruled it out.

    So now it's down to a Toyota 200 series, RRS L494 or L405 (probably out of my price range).
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB Gone
    2023 Ford Ranga

  3. #333
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    It's all good, I'm coming due to replace my D4 and this thread has given me cause to re-evaluate the Y62 and a few others. I looked at the Y62 when I was searching for a new car last time but was turned off by what I thought was a too high price (it has come down a lot since then), a compromised Arab interior (the D4 is nicer and better laid out IMO) and an exterior that I still can't really think of as better than butt ugly. I do like the drivetrain and ability to run decent diameter tyres.
    This time around it has dropped of my list due to the lack of towing software now I have a large van, the physical size and the interior. Also it appears that is considerably thirstier than the D4 V8 when towing from what i have read. As the only time I pay for fuel is when I tow my van this is a consideration.

    I've looked at the L322 TDV8 and V8SC but the 250kg tow ball weight and very limited GVM has ruled it out.

    So now it's down to a Toyota 200 series, RRS L494 or L405 (probably out of my price range).
    What weight are you wanting to tow? Inc Ball weight?

  4. #334
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,543
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    What weight are you wanting to tow? Inc Ball weight?
    Current van has a max of 3 tonne, I'm usually up at about 2.8 - 2.9t when loaded.
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB Gone
    2023 Ford Ranga

  5. #335
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    Current van has a max of 3 tonne, I'm usually up at about 2.8 - 2.9t when loaded.
    And do you have a measured (confirmed) ball Weight?

  6. #336
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,543
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When I put it over the weighbridge unloaded (2.6t) but with water tanks full ball weight was 280kg, I haven't checked it loaded yet.
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB Gone
    2023 Ford Ranga

  7. #337
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had an old Nissan 4X4 and I flogged the guts out of it then I gave it to my young Bloke and he has flogged the gets out of it.
    Guess what? it is still running

    The Older 4X4's were far less complex than the new ones and I suppose that is the major reason for their being pretty much bullet proof.
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  8. #338
    Tombie Guest
    They were pretty bloody gutless too!
    When you’re engines making SFA by modern standards it’s pretty hard to break much!

  9. #339
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    When I put it over the weighbridge unloaded (2.6t) but with water tanks full ball weight was 280kg, I haven't checked it loaded yet.
    Sounds like you’ll be shopping for a GVM and GCM upgrade!

  10. #340
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Are the autoboxes in the full fat Rangie still short life? If you service it regularly (taking off the sealed for life sticker...) but still tow a decent boat or van at or around 2 tonnes how long are the boxes lasting?

    JC I can see why you would spend $75_85k on a V8 top of the range as second hand they have all the fruit...but you are an LR mech and have the knowledge and gear to fix all the fruit...for me the idea of spending that coin on such a complex beast (with known soft autos...assuming that is still the case) out of warranty leaves me with a cold shiver.

    Cheers

Page 34 of 55 FirstFirst ... 24323334353644 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!