Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: What filter for landscapes?

  1. #11
    300+ Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    Steve, I said "HDR have a lot of applications but some times cannot be used"
    If the photographer would like to freeze the motion using a high shutter speed then HDR is not good.
    If there is wind and the branches are moving, then with HDR there will be a motion blur on them.
    If it is cluody and windy then the sky will be not good.
    By the way, you have posted very nice images
    Here is one in HDR and the sky is reasonable good because there was little wind.



    Cheers
    The trick to it is to load all the base images into PS as layers along with the HDR. Then create layer masks to burn through to the single image with the frozen motion that you are after. That way you don't have to have the movement which would otherwise be an issue.

    Cheers, Steve

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0
    HDR looks interesting (had to google it) but I am not particularly into editing images at the moment. Just trying to get the best photo I can at the time and maybe try my very limited PS skills on one or two images that I really like.

    Wikipedia mentioned that some newer cameras will do the HDR stuff for you which would be useful but no doubt not as could as a pro could do afterwards.

  3. #13
    300+ Guest
    Hi, the best info on HDR is here: HDR Tutorial | High Dynamic Range Tutorial It explains the whole layer process.

    If you don't want to create the images in software you will need a graduated filter. That is the only way you can have one exposure which will capture the extreme brightness of the sky and the relative darkness of the ground.

    If you shoot in RAW (which I always recomend) you have the option to apply a graduated ND filter in lightroom, or whatever you use to manage your images.

    There are a few stops more dynamic range in RAW that in JPEG so you can often recover cloud details that way. See here for a quick tutorial: Jao's photo blog: The new grad ND tool

    The Lightroom method is manipulating the poor capture and can often produce very good results, but is bit of a bodge if the scene really needed a grad ND. A grad ND will mean getting the capture right, which is more likely to result in better results. But you need a rectangular filter holder for them, which is a bit of a faff.

    I've never tried the in camera HDR, but my assumption is that they just blend three images and don't offer any layer burn through features. This is very limiting. It might be fun to play with, but I doubt you'll love the results.

    Cheers, Steve

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You can use a polariser, too.

    [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizing_filter_%28Photography%29[/ame]

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!