Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: What filter for landscapes?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0

    What filter for landscapes?

    Hi folks,

    Just a quick question.

    We have a Canon 450D. Not camera buffs but it does take nice pictures.

    I want to get something to help get rid of the problem when you take landscape pictures where you either get a picture of the sky and the foreground is dark or a picture of the foreground with a blown out bright sky.

    Should I get a polarising filter or some of those graduated neutral density filter?

    Any other options or ideas?

    I've had Hoya filters before including a polarising one (doesn't fit this camera/lens) but what brands do you guys like?

    Any online shops I can look at that are trustworthy?
    There is only one camera shop in town and they only had really cheap stuff.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For overexposure/underexposure of sky and ground you want an ND grad.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Perth, Gosnells
    Posts
    31
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you are doing a lot of daytime shooting then ND Filters to stop overexposure, if you are looking to cut down reflections, take away some exposure, and boost a little colour Polarising Filters.

    Also filter systems like the Cokin system that allow you to use Gradual ND filters where you can position the filter just on the section above the horizon etc... This sort of system will address the issue you have brought up directly, the other two can help depending on your shooting style.

    Can always shoot in HDR but thats a whole other aspect

    I prefer a quality brand I know like Hoya for my everyday filters like UV and CPL, but no harm in trying some of the cheaper ones for experimentation like coloured filters.

    Hope this helps a little

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    gradual ND filters are the best to take shots when the sky is to bright.
    You have a good reading HERE
    THIS site is an excellent place to learn many things about photography including exposure and filters
    I would no go for the Cokin range beacause they put a cast on the image however the Cokin holders are ok and can be used with any brand.
    I prefer hand holding and go for the bigest size.
    IMO what it s good to have are the 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9
    Hitech filters are excellent and not expensive like the awesome Singh-Ray range

    Cheers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks. After reading this and googling some of the ideas I think I'll go with something like the Cokin P Series ND filters. You can get the ND2,3,4 and holder in a set with a 58mm ring for $150 delivered. This seems okay. However I'll look around for other brands in that style before I commit to anything.

    I prefer the idea of the above setup than the Hoya screw on ones for this due to positioning of the clear/dark line on the glass.
    Hoya don't seem to make them in this style but maybe I wasn't looking in the right places.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a Hoya Pro polarizing filter in my Tokina 12-24 and it is Ok.
    Remember that Cokin filters produce a very strong magenta cast.
    The colour cast can be partially removed in post processing but then then you will spending lots of time removing it can be very, very aggravating. Lee, B+W, Hitech and Singh–Ray filters are reported to be neutral in colour.
    if you use Cokin make sure that you take shots in raw

  7. #7
    300+ Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Utemad View Post
    Hi folks,
    I want to get something to help get rid of the problem when you take landscape pictures where you either get a picture of the sky and the foreground is dark or a picture of the foreground with a blown out bright sky.

    Should I get a polarising filter or some of those graduated neutral density filter?

    Any other options or ideas?
    HDR Dude. Shoot naked!

    Steve

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 300+ View Post
    HDR Dude. Shoot naked!

    Steve
    Not so sure Steve, a waterfall in HDR will be no much good and you need the filter to cut the glare on the leafs is the photo is taken in the forest.
    HDR have a lot of applications but some times cannot be used.

  9. #9
    300+ Guest
    Yeah, these HDRs suck

    Steve




  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Steve, I said "HDR have a lot of applications but some times cannot be used"
    If the photographer would like to freeze the motion using a high shutter speed then HDR is not good.
    If there is wind and the branches are moving, then with HDR there will be a motion blur on them.
    If it is cluody and windy then the sky will be not good.
    By the way, you have posted very nice images
    Here is one in HDR and the sky is reasonable good because there was little wind.



    Cheers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!