Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Anyone using a Nikon D750

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Anyone using a Nikon D750

    Hey guys

    Just putting some feelers out.

    I have a D7100 I have been and I'm still very happy with it my only complaint would have to be that the low light performance I think could be better.

    Anyway regardless of that

    I'm getting to a stage where I'm really considering a full frame camera.

    I believe the entry level full frame is the D610 however I have also read the performance is not much on the D7100/200 it's only mark tally better just full frame.

    I have also read that the D810 is the ducks guts and built like a tank however the D750 is very similar in performance and many people seem to be really happy with them.

    Anyone else have any thoughts?

    At the moment I'm just looking and dreaming but will soon start to keep my eyes on the second hand market.

    Just thought I would start a discussion on it to help fuel my "I would like one of those" Anyone using a Nikon D750
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Funny coincidence but I'm looking at upgrading to either a 7200 or d750. From what I've read, d7200 has great low light performance and is now the top of the range for nikon dx cameras.
    the question for me is whether i pay the extra $1000 for a fullframe camera or i spend that money on a quality lens.
    I guess where d750 or any other fx camera would show its advantage when using shooting with lenses wide open f1.4 or f1.2.
    I'll be following this post. It's an interesting one.
    Can

    Sent from my SM-G900I usin AULRO mobile app

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Montrose, Vic.
    Posts
    5,417
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am shooting with a D750 - I love it.

    I went through the same thing a while back Lou... 610... 750...810... ????

    The one thing I do miss with full frame is the 1.5 crop when I am shooting birds or similar at a distance.... it certainly helps "get closer"

    I kept my D7000 as well, so it's not a major issue and I am learning to work with it. The big advantage from that point of view of a D810 is that even using crop mode you still have lots of pixels on the sensor

    D7100 24MP
    D810 36MP crop modes, 1.2x (25 MP), and 1.5x (15.3 MP)
    D750 24MP crop modes 1.2 x (16.7MP) and 1.5X (10MP)


    So depending what you shoot, if you intend to only keep one, I see a reason to stretch to the D810.

    That said, I love the D750, landscapes and low light it is amazing. The Nikon trainer I was talking to last week, has access to anything...he told me currently the D750 is is favourite all round body. (He was using one on the walk.
    Last edited by Bytemrk; 8th November 2015 at 12:49 PM.
    Mark

    Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most

    2015 TDV6 D4.... the latest project... Llams, Traxide, Icom 455, Tuffant Kimberleys and Mofos.... so far.
    2012 SDV6 SE D4 with some stuff... gone...
    2003 D2a TD5...gone...
    2000 D2 V8...gone...
    https://bymark.photography


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah plan to keep both. I don't really have a need for 36mp because I'm not printing huge pictures.

    As for candeniz I would honestly say unless you have the good glass I would be inclined to by the D7200 and start putting the rest of the money towards good glass build up the glass and then do what I would like to do and buy a full frame once the glass is available. Otherwise I reckon you would feel hampered especially if you can only afford say on lense.

    What I actually did was get a DX I bought one good FX lense and a couple of good DX lenses and over the years I started to slowly replace the DX stuff. I only have the ultra wide to change and I will have full range from 12mm to 200 in fast glass
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  5. #5
    MrLandy Guest
    The D810 is a pro quality camera and more solidly built. I use a D800 and it gets knocked around a lot. This is a big factor if you're out bush a lot I reckon. The D750 looks like a great camera too, many of the specs are the same, it has a flip out screen, it's 100grams lighter and a bit less bulky ...but, that's because it's not as solidly built. So it would be the D810 for me for durability.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi dullbird

    I have a reasonable collection of lenses from when i used to shoot on my good old FE2. Ive got a 50mmf1.4, 28mm f2.8, 70-210mm f4-5.6 which are solid lenses and produce quality images. They are manual lenses so i really rely on a good focus system on my camera which is only a d3100. Focussing a manual lens on a digital camera is quite a challenge so d7100 or d750 d610 with 51 focus points would help a lot.

    I also have a kit lens 18-55mm (plastic) and a samyang 8mm. These lenses are only good on dx cameras.

    I mainly shoot architecture and portrait so need a wide angle lens and a fast prime lens like 50mm to achieve good bokeh.

    My other concern is that the higher you go up the full frame range the bigger and heavier they get. Especially in an urban environment during travels, it is a bugger to carry around the camera and lenses on foot. I need something lighter. I even considered buying a fuji xt1 but cost factor is an issue and fuji lenses are very dear. Would not be an issue if i made a living on photography but that's not the case.

    The sensors on dx cameras have much improved so much that the image quality is very close to full frame images. Would you notice the difference with naked eye? At what iso.. probably not up to 1600 but maybe beyond.

    Anyway at the end of the day the question remains... dx or fx?
    cde

    Sent from my SM-G900I using AULRO mobile app

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Then I think only you can answer that. Anyone using a Nikon D750. I think it will come down to what ever your compromises are.

    For me I won't push to the D810 purely because of cost. The cost of one of these second hand I could almost get a D750 new. The weight thing doesn't bother me to much.

    I will just struggle to spend the money when I have a very capable camera already.

    There has just been a couple of instances when I have realised lately that having a FX would have been a real benefit.
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  8. #8
    MrLandy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by candeniz View Post
    Hi dullbird

    I have a reasonable collection of lenses from when i used to shoot on my good old FE2. Ive got a 50mmf1.4, 28mm f2.8, 70-210mm f4-5.6 which are solid lenses and produce quality images. They are manual lenses so i really rely on a good focus system on my camera which is only a d3100. Focussing a manual lens on a digital camera is quite a challenge so d7100 or d750 d610 with 51 focus points would help a lot.

    I also have a kit lens 18-55mm (plastic) and a samyang 8mm. These lenses are only good on dx cameras.

    I mainly shoot architecture and portrait so need a wide angle lens and a fast prime lens like 50mm to achieve good bokeh.

    My other concern is that the higher you go up the full frame range the bigger and heavier they get. Especially in an urban environment during travels, it is a bugger to carry around the camera and lenses on foot. I need something lighter. I even considered buying a fuji xt1 but cost factor is an issue and fuji lenses are very dear. Would not be an issue if i made a living on photography but that's not the case.

    The sensors on dx cameras have much improved so much that the image quality is very close to full frame images. Would you notice the difference with naked eye? At what iso.. probably not up to 1600 but maybe beyond.

    Anyway at the end of the day the question remains... dx or fx?
    cde

    Sent from my SM-G900I using AULRO mobile app
    No question, FX is better. But only if needed in a professional situation. A D750 would be awesome for most people's needs. Agree $1000 spent on a great FX lens now, would be better than on camera for most people. And you can always upgrade the camera later, then you already have the lens.

  9. #9
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Lou, keep an eye on Gumtree. A brand new unwanted prize might be coming up for sale. See Best place to sell unwanted camera (prize) - Photography - Whirlpool Forums
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah he will get good money for that Ron.
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!