im sure this will have been covered befour but cant seem to find anything on it? (please link me to it if theres already a thread)
this might be a bit hard to follow but here goes...
i have a 1980 2 door v8 4spd manual, and the problem im having is that at some point in my cars life it had a lift kit put on it. when i first bought the car i put it up on the hoist at work and instead of the front axle botteming out on the shocks as it should, the front prop shaft was resting on the chassis cross member and thats what stopped the axle from dropping any further, which im sure we all agree is not ideal.
since my car has had a hard life (ex comp) the lift kit has sagged to normal looking height over the years. since i was just trying to get it road Worthy at that time i just put a set of standard ride height shockies in it as it was bouncing about with the old ones, and next time it went up on the hoist there was about 1cm clearance between the prop-shaft and cross member with the std height shocks fitted.
now i want to put a 2" lift kit on it and dont know what to do with the shocks? i see rrc all the time with lift kits in them so surely its possible? but the std ride hight shocks are only giving me 1cm clearance at full axle drop between the prop and cross member? do i leave std height shocks in the front or will the 2" lift top-out (i guess you could say?) the std shocks?
i know that the prop will clear the crossmember when on/off the road because atleast one wheel will have weight on it, but as its up on a hoist a fair bit i dont like the thought of the axel resting on it atall. does anyone cut the crossmember and modify it to help clear?
i am planing on putting a double cardon prop in the front so maby that would help, but i dont know if i need the double joint for just a two inch lift. (it will be getting a 2" body lift aswell but that doesnt have anything to do with anything.)
cheers, andy
cheers mate, ill have a look at that later.
cheers, andy
be interested to see some pics.
Take a look at these. The crossmember has just been dropped slightly and new holes drilled. It is only held by the bottom bolts but as this is an interference fit (you need a jack betwen the chassis rails to ease the pressure on the crossmember for removal) this should not be a problem.
Lots of Trucks you will see MINUS the cross member. That may be an option. The cross member you have pictured is not original, as in 1980 it was a large rectangular section unit.Mine was minus the cross member (6 years at least) till recently when I changes the transfer case mounts and put in a disco unit that fitted behind the auto box. No clearance issues.
Michael T
2011 L322 Range Rover 4.4 TDV8 Vogue
Aussie '88 RR Tdi300 (+lpg), Auto (RIP ... now body removed after A pillar, chassis extension to 130 & fire tender tray.)
ye bigdog, as rrturbo says mine is different, thanks for the pics though.
im aware of the springs and shocks being matched sizes but didnt want the +4 shocks in as the prop would fowl the cross member if they travel any further than they do now, i think somehow dropping the cross member will be the go. thats a bit down the line anyway as im up to my neck in cooling systems at them moment and its just on my to do list.
what do you guys do to jack the chassis rails apart? i dont have one of those big 4wd jacks, just a bottle jack and some sturdy spacer?
cheers, andy
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks