Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Victorian RWC - Failed Inspection!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The lean is a BS statement, as suggested swap the springs around and see how you go. Fuel filter, that's the factory spot dunno what the blokes on about. So that makes all RRC post 1986 not roadworthy? What a tool

    Only time I cringe when I get an old Rangie is roadworthy time. At least you only have to do it once.

    Trav

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had one RWC inspector say I had to replace the springs in the wiper arms. When I tried to get springs from a parts supplier he asked why? I told him and he suggested the RWC fellow was being ridiculous and suggested I just say they had been replaced.
    So, on the day of the next inspection, the RWC tester went through the list. I told him I had replaced the springs with good s/h ones. He lifted the wiper arms and said "Much better."
    I got my RWC.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Victoria - Pakenham
    Posts
    1,268
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    Victorian RWC's are very strict now, They even have to take photos of the tyres, speedo & defects etc incase of an Audit, and also covers them if someone swaps a mates new tyres on just for the RWC test. They days of going to see your RWC mate & letting a car thru that you promise not to sell are gone
    As far as I'm aware they only have to do this if it fails the first time. They do still however have to take pictures of the VIN I think.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lidvii View Post
    .... ....
    [*]The car body leans to the right (Springs?)

    paul
    Surely the issue is not whether it leans, but rather how much it leans. There must be a limit to how much is acceptable.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  5. #15
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I always have a copy of the RRC requirements from Vicroads with me when I get any car done. If they say something needs doing I ask them to point out where in the document it says that. Half the time they can't show me, so I ask them to cross that off the list or I will report them to Vicroads.

    I have found a reasonable place to get them done now - they only pick on what is in the document and not all that other ****.

    Here is the doc -http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/NR/rd...6_1212_WEB.pdf

    They can only pick what is listed in here. At a quick glance I can't find anything to say your fuel filter is unroadworthy.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    just swap coils . left for right , do front first that might just fix it, very easy to do.
    Ive had plenty of horrors trying to get landies roadworthy..

    My favorite was replace the brake pads on a series.

    "Sorry mate can you come and show me how you inspected that? I didnt see you put the vehicle over the pit or climb under it"

    I did.

    "Funny I didnt see you take the wheels off"

    You dont have to take the wheels off to inspect pad thickness you just peek in over the top of the backing plate inside the rim with an inspection mirror and a torch. Have you ever inspected brakes before?

    "yep, I want you to come out and show me how you inspected the pads, I suspect that if you had you would have noticed something about the rotors too"

    yeah, they were a bit thin, Think I'll write you up for them too since your being a smart ass.
    (Scribble)

    "Go get your supervisor you idiot"

    (at that point the conversation degrades into a one on one abuse match till the supervisor comes over)

    Whats the problem.

    "Apparently the pads and rotors on my 76 series landy are worn below legal limits"

    Dont old landies have drum brakes

    "Yep, explain that to the numpty thats just officially recorded that my vehicles brake pads and rotors are below legal limits, might also want to tell him to remove fuel leak from carby since its a diesel"
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Naturally the rate of crashes, injuries and fatalities due to mechanical defects in those states that have annual roadworthy inspections is far less than the same figures for West Australia.....

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superquag View Post
    Naturally the rate of crashes, injuries and fatalities due to mechanical defects in those states that have annual roadworthy inspections is far less than the same figures for West Australia.....
    The Vehicle Unit of Monash University have actually investigated this and found that there is no difference of accident rates caused by mechanical failures between jurisdictions that have annual roadworthys and those that don't.

    The reasons were complex but the main reason was that in the states with roadworthies drivers tend not to maintain their cars as well and let the tester pick up things once a year and if things like tyres are noticed before hand they are left until testing time and do it then. In states with no roadworthys owners tend to fix things when they pick them up - now these are overall findings and we all know people who do nothing and others who do a lot.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  9. #19
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is a discussion paper just released in Vic in which one scenario would see the RWC dropped entirely. A more likely one is that RWC would be dropped for cars less than 10 years old.

    I can't see them dropping them entirely - maybe it is the start of a push to a yearly check like other states.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post
    I've hear this also. It is intentional for manufacturing. I think it has something to do with making the car sit level on the road so it tracks better. No roads are flat. It is only the front drivers side the it lower.

    I'd bet american RRC's would lean to the left.
    Yes, that's exactly it. All talk of springs sagging over time etc is in addition to the factory setup right hand lean. All my cars (japanese and euro) are like this. It compensates for the camber in the road.

    But just wait for someone to chime in claiming that higher springs should go in the drivers side to "carry the weight of the driver".

    However, in addition to the normal bias, my 85 RRC had the radius arm brackets welded on the front diff not straight. One would sit higher than the other when the diff was removed with arms attached. The disco diff I have in there now has both arms even. But I don't know when exactly they fixed the problem in the factory.
    This bracket misalignment causes all rangies of that era to lean more to the right. Even the ones in LHD countries.
    With straight radius arm brackets and the right springs they lean ~10mm to the right in RHD countries and ~10mm to the left in LHD countries.


    In NZ we have 6 monthly WOF checks. For vehicles under 6 years old it's every 12 months. I just had another today.
    With four vehicles I see those guys 7 times a year.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!