Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Silly ideas, but help me out with them.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,781
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco Muppet View Post
    Interesting, I Was under the impression 24 spline axles were significantly stronger....
    Will a rangie body go on a defender chassis though?
    With some fabricated out riggers it will, 120 should have a salisbury diff in it which is much stronger than a rover diff.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting.
    Gives me much greater options in terms of 110/120/130 wheelbase etc.
    Cheers
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Victoria - Pakenham
    Posts
    1,268
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Apparently the chassis on the defenders, rrc and disco 1's are similar. I do know you can put a classic body on a d1 chassis. To achieve what you're after you might be better off with defender type chassis to begin with, like someone else mentioned the diffs are stronger. But to answer you question about disco 1 diffs in rrc. They bolt straight in. I'm running 1998 disco1 diffs in my 1988 rrc. I brought the full assemblies front and rear. Simply rolled them under the car and bolted them in. The diffs have sway bar mounts that I'm not using. The trouble only starts with the brake calipers. Disco calipers only run 1 brake line, the rrc has two. The rrc calipers bolt holes are about 0.5mm too small to mount them to the disco diff assembly. So your have the option of drill out the holes slightly larger or run the disco calipers and block one brake line, you have to choose the correct brake lone too. Hope that helps.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, decided that as much as I'd like to do it in one hit it will be easier to get the engine and gearbox in and focus on sorting that out, then worry about chopping it a bit later
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm sure you can move the cab on. I'd even be interested in it.
    2001 Land Rover Defender 110 (4X4) 5 Speed Manual 4x4 Cab Chassis | Cars, Vans & Utes | Gumtree Australia Litchfield Area - Knuckey Lagoon | 1042017828
    Oh, I don't think it's a 110. Not with that wheelbase.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's a desirable 130 Big Cab.
    Scott

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    Don't forget to get an engineer on board before you do this.

    Another thought, get a 120" Defender and rebody it.
    The 120" had the Isuzu. There was a 120" "restorers delight" in the Marketplace Alerts section a few weeks back.
    That's exactly what I was thinking. John (bush65) is doing something similar right now with a bushranger body cut to a ute on a 120" LR chassis. I understand the 110/120" chassis have deeper (hence stronger) rails than the rangie/disco chassis.

    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    ^^^^^ Best advice right above.

    Also 24 spline D1 shafts are really not much stronger than 10 spline, if at all.

    DL
    24 spline axles are a far better design. People get all carried away with the ashcroft tests which were a single twist to failure. Single twists to failure aren't common. Virtually all failures are fatigue and the 24 spline axles are a far better design to resist fatigue failure (crack initiation and growth) than the 10 spline.

    But that said, if you intend to replace the diff centres and drive-shafts there is no benefit then that's all the failure prone bits sorted anyway.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!