Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Antenna mounting

  1. #11
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Mounting pic from Expedition Exchange. Bracket bolted to wheel mount.

    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, outer South East
    Posts
    2,283
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    Yes, I know I should (I am a qualified radio tech - I even have a BOCP) but, like most people, mounting take precedence over radiation pattern.

    I only run UHF and I'm currently using a ground independent antenna. I've probably got around 5-7 metres of RG58C/U which has a loss of about 2-3 dB at 477 MHz.

    I guess by moving the antenna to the rear, I could reduce the loss to about 1.5dB but will the radiation pattern be worse? I don't have the test equipment ot measure it.

    Ron
    Sorry if I sounded patronising - wasn't trying to be. I didn't know you were a tech. Anyway glad to meet another radio tech on here. I've been "off the tools" for many a year now and stuck behind a desk ( unfortunately ).

    As you'd know ( but others reading this may not ) if you have 3db loss in your cable you lose half your transmit power between your radio and the antenna ( ie from 5 watts down to 2.5 watts. ) so if you can get the length down below 3 metres or so, that's gotta be a good thing don't it ?.

    now, radiation pattern, as long as the antenna whip is entirely above the roofline, it should be fairly omnidirectional. More importantly, it would be good and high, and as you know UHF is "line of sight" so the higher the better.

    With the antenna whip low down behind the back door as in the pic earlier I would say the radiation pattern and antenna efficiency will be c**p - quite frankly.

    Above the roofline, there is the problem of it hitting branches etc but IMHO on the bullbar it hits plenty of things too !

    I've seen quite a few antennas just "fall off" bullbars, possibly due to the "resonance" effect set up, causing metal fatigue.

    Sticking up above the roof may be a problem in carparks etc, but if it is on a spring base you can bend it over and hold it down wih a bungee cord or something.

    you're right - with radio as in life, it's always a compromise between performance and convenience !!
    Last edited by waynep; 27th February 2007 at 02:14 AM.

  3. #13
    JES Guest
    Perhaps use a bracket similar to the pic Ron posted, but add telescopic pole that can be lifted when better performance is required, and dropped when going through carparks etc.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here are some pics of my bracket. Designed for the load from a HF autotune antenna.

    My autotune is on the bullbar for the moment. The extra bracket for the reverse light was made to be a spacer so the autotune will clear the 33" spare tyre.

    The spacer between the spare wheel mount and the door, is only to compensate for the dent in the door (from reversing misshap with spare tyre).
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #15
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'll just put in my oar here. Firstly, for the record, both my Landrovers have the UHF antenna mounted on the bullbar, like almost all work vehicles have round here. For my use, seems to work perfectly well. The advantage of the bullbar is you can see it about to hit something! Not like the antenna on the roof of my tractor, which is now bent to near horizontal after a brush with overhanging shrubbery (out of sight, out of mind). Mind you, it still works!

    One of the things you need to consider is that UHF is almost purely line of sight - which means that greater effective radiated power is of little use except that it enables you to talk over the top of others. So radiation pattern is a lot more important than loss in your transmission line. Same sort of thing with the VHF on my yacht - the additional line loss with moving the antenna to the masthead is irrelevant compared to the extra ten metres or so height. Also consider one of the nuisances we get here occasionally is the ultralight aircraft using "our" UHF channel - they come through very well from over a hundred miles at ten thousand feet, using 1w handhelds!

    So by far the best place for your UHF is in the middle of the roof, but since your range is mostly going to be limited by the nearest hill, unless it is in a very bad location, you probably won't notice the difference.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Doreen, Melbourne
    Posts
    612
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here is to resurrecting an old thread...

    Mounted to the front of my Disco by way of an ARB B/Bar is an elevated ground independant UHF antenna ( 5dB ) on spring mount and a VHF whip.

    I was thinking of making a bracket of the rear wheel mount and having another lot of mounting points so I can move the antennas to the back when on trips and wanting more range hopefully achieved by being higher from the vehicle.

    Question is - Does anyone know what should be the minimum distance seperating the two antennas? The UHF is 5W, the VHF 25W. I have been advised that the 25W will interfer with the UHF when transmitting but can't confirm this. Currently they wouldn't be more than 600mm apart I should think...the distance between the two tabs on the ARB b/bar.

    The coax run to the rear may be only one metre more than to the front so I'm not too concerned with power loss...or should i?

    Thanks in advance.
    Last edited by Signal1; 14th September 2009 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Emoticon pops up with B)
    '01 D2 V8 4.6 Auto 7 Seater ACE
    Town Car - '11 Ford Mondeo Titanium TDCi -
    LROCV Member

  7. #17
    mousie Guest
    Just finished a small lathe job with 60mm solid reducing down to the 49mm wheel hole and then further reductions and polish off. Cabling through the mag and into the vehicle. Easily mated with the yaesu 857 located inside right storage bin and led remote press button to activate tune cycle in the headlight adjustment panel which area was vacant (behind cover). Remote head in roof mount above front interior light. Works a hoot for me as a ham. I found an old sell call 8422 box and these easily mate to the radio as well if you can find one via the paket connector for permanent or semi permanent if you need, (just turn radio volume down) as sell call is fixed audio out.

    The Yaesu was selected as cheaper than icom, less current draw in receive, also can make extension cables rather than icom only stuff. Wanted and Icom so would have built in either as both reliable.

    Yaesu and icom tune interfaces can be found on their groups site and does work very well. I know there are negatives but I just wanted to put the autotune on for a couple of trips a year and remove radio when finished with the harness left in tact. I'm an old believer in stick as well and back with the series one, I just used the fishing reel with copper line which really meant I was in for a roasting by others until I fired it up and before the women used it for clothes line!!!!

    The downside with ham in the TD5, depending on your luck is injector noise!!! and I'm not alone here with ebay coming to the rescue for 'ferrite' packs way cheaper than Jaycar. On this subject you need to get mix 31 material but most ferrite's don't tell you what material they are. Another site on this forum shows the areas for install if your having RFI. Hope this assists with a mounting option for larger HF stuff. Geoff
    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #18
    mousie Guest
    Hi Signal1 and just read your post above mine again. I forgot the calculations re freq and close proximity of aerials and in crude terms when close, one or the other can act as either the reflector or director from the driven antenna to become directional and you TV antenna is generally works this way. So when you see the certain folk that lineup 3+ antennas up in a row, I have a chuckle given they can render the whole show as ineffective in theory. Having said this, vehicles are a compromise anyway so if you can get distance and practical then you will be fine.

    End of the day, quality components at UHF with some understanding of different antenna types from say 30 minute read on the net will result in a good to very good setup. Particularly if you can get your hands on full shield rg58 quality cabling and not the crappy stuff.

    For example my preference after a lot of signal testing on vehicles was the RFI ground independent geting around 4 - 4.5db rubber duck styles you see on commercials in the city. Need to cut correctly and no soldering required at base as just a fixed end length of centre conducter for transfer of signal. Bullet proof cheap design for all round use.

    Series 1 disco using a gutter mount was always a tune nightmare for me so I avoided this area after a few failed attempts.

    Hope this helps

    Geoff

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!