Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 86

Thread: Fuel consumption V8

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    598
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'll say it again check the vac advance diaphram is not toast, this is good for 50km at least per tank, and set the timeing at 6 before

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    tara qld
    Posts
    77
    Total Downloaded
    0
    hey thanx mate yeh took it to mr automotive today first thing they saw that the hose was on wrong side he said thats the timing advanced straight up will let u know what they find its there for a few days getn service stuff done as well

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    115
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shaunp View Post
    I'll say it again check the vac advance diaphram is not toast, this is good for 50km at least per tank, and set the timeing at 6 before
    My vac advance was totally toasted. I replaced it. This had no effect on any of the problems I had with the car. As with every repair I do, it got better for a day or three, then went back to it's old ways. :O(

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    tara qld
    Posts
    77
    Total Downloaded
    0
    bugger i am hoping this fixes it i love the
    car lol

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    58
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got the same horrible fuel consumption you do, roughly 150-170km from 30-35L of petrol and 200km from 70-75L of LPG. Does it make a difference what octane lvl of fuel you run?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    926
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Apocalypsse View Post
    I've got the same horrible fuel consumption you do, roughly 150-170km from 30-35L of petrol and 200km from 70-75L of LPG. Does it make a difference what octane lvl of fuel you run?
    Sounds like I've got the same setup as you (scuba tanks?) and that's about the worst I get on LPG, although it is all city driving mostly with air con going so that could have something to do with it...also got a big a$$ cage roof rack on it...hmmmmmm

    I run premium unleaded only, apparently it makes a fair difference on fuel economy but you never really know unless you try and log all of them for a decent amount of time.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    58
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Young Angus View Post
    Sounds like I've got the same setup as you (scuba tanks?) and that's about the worst I get on LPG, although it is all city driving mostly with air con going so that could have something to do with it...also got a big a$$ cage roof rack on it...hmmmmmm

    I run premium unleaded only, apparently it makes a fair difference on fuel economy but you never really know unless you try and log all of them for a decent amount of time.
    Yea scuba tanks with cut down petrol tanks. I've been running Premium 98 until just now I filled with 95, its only a 4c per litre difference but worth a try. Freeway driving extends my range a bit, haven't used aircon enough to notice a difference in fuel economy.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    blackbutt qld
    Posts
    418
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Since I stopped towing the car trailer with the D1, I have been screwing the LPG volume screw in, quarter of a turn at a time. I did get down to 17l/100km, but it was so slow it was like driving my old diesel 2A. So I wound it back out half a turn and its now doing 19/100km. It has done 356,000k.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    598
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattskii View Post
    My vac advance was totally toasted. I replaced it. This had no effect on any of the problems I had with the car. As with every repair I do, it got better for a day or three, then went back to it's old ways. :O(
    Vac advance does the following
    it advances the timing in line with mainfold vac, ie more vac, the more advance. This has 2 effects to an engine, increased fuel ecconomy and lower engine temp. So at cruise and light throttle when the engine is not loaded up it will have an effect on fuel consumption. Max vacuum is at cruise basically. If you conatantly use WOT it has little effect as you would have low vacuum in any case, in this case the only advance you get above static timing is ude to the centrifugal (mechanical) advance in the dissy which would be all in at around 3k rpm I guess.
    It makes a differeance trust me.
    What were you tring to fix?

  10. #30
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,708
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Apocalypsse View Post
    I've got the same horrible fuel consumption you do, roughly 150-170km from 30-35L of petrol and 200km from 70-75L of LPG. Does it make a difference what octane lvl of fuel you run?


    Why not make it easy for everyone by converting that to the standard litres/100km then we'd have a figure from which we can work. If you can't be bothered doing it, I'm not going to.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!