Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 90

Thread: Catastrophic engine failure on a TD5

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    I’ve got a 2001 build TD5 defender. (would be good if people identified their vehicles when posting/replying)

    I had oil tests done on mine while it was still under warranty and this disclosed fuel contamination in the oil (30,000K’s).

    I took the tests to LR and after explaining to them what an oil test was they initially changed the head. Then did the injector seals twice.

    Finally they did the injectors. Which seemed to fix the problem.

    My concern was not so much with the possibility of the engine running on. More the increased engine wear caused by the oil being diluted by the fuel. My understanding is that over a long period of time fuel contaminating the oil really increases engine wear.

    Interestingly while LR while reviewing the oil analysis LR agreed to do an oil change free every 5,000k’s.

    My understanding is that LR did have a batch of porous heads and also a batch of faulty injectors around 2001/2002. I originally decided to have my oil checked because it was cheap ($30) and at the time (2003) a number posts were coming up on the UK forums with this problem.

    I’m interested in this fuel return line modification?
    Geez, was it that long ago Scott ?

    I remember discussing it on the old and now defunct LRE Forum :cheers:

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    962
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by robbotd5 View Post
    Just be careful before you dirll out the restriction in the fuel return, it is there to maintain pressure in the fuel supply drilling in the head that feeds fuel to the injectors. It is there for a reason. Got my injector seals replaced today, all is good so I will just monitor oil level from now on and hope for the best.
    Regards Robbo.
    The restrictor is after the fuel pressure regulator so the fuel pressure remains the same in the head. the pressure drop is in the return line. All you get is a increase fuel flow. I think the theory from LR technical is to have the fuel at a lower temp with increased flow, this would make the viscosity of the diesel higher. Which would slow the fuel ingress.

  3. #63
    scott oz Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Geez, was it that long ago Scott ?

    I remember discussing it on the old and now defunct LRE Forum :cheers:

    Yep I posted my experance on to that forum. LR Australia (LRA) had no idea what an oil test was and had to refer it to the UK. At one stage LRA said I had "no proof of a problem other than the independant test?"

    I kid you not.

    In the end they did seemed to have fixed the problem. As I change the oil ever 10,000 and there is no change in the level all seems to be going well.

  4. #64
    scott oz Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by woko View Post
    The restrictor is after the fuel pressure regulator so the fuel pressure remains the same in the head. the pressure drop is in the return line. All you get is a increase fuel flow. I think the theory from LR technical is to have the fuel at a lower temp with increased flow, this would make the viscosity of the diesel higher. Which would slow the fuel ingress.
    OK I’ve read the thread and am confused; which is not difficult being non technical.

    If the purpose of drilling out the restrictor is to help prevent fuel contaminating the oil by reducing the pressure (on injector seals?). If the regulator maintains the pressure in the head (injector seals) despite the enlarged restrictor what’s achieved by drilling out the restrictor?

    If the fuel flow increases and the regulator still maintains pressure, then that must mean the fuel pump is working harder? At least that’s my non technical take?

    Would really like to understand this.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    962
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    OK I’ve read the thread and am confused; which is not difficult being non technical.

    If the purpose of drilling out the restrictor is to help prevent fuel contaminating the oil by reducing the pressure (on injector seals?). If the regulator maintains the pressure in the head (injector seals) despite the enlarged restrictor what’s achieved by drilling out the restrictor?

    If the fuel flow increases and the regulator still maintains pressure, then that must mean the fuel pump is working harder? At least that’s my non technical take?

    Would really like to understand this.
    The pressure on the injector seal is the same and will always have to be to maintain correct pressures for injection (it a bit more complicated than that but we are not worried about injection pressures for combustion, this is supply pressure) All pressures in the system remain the same except the return pressure.
    Enlarging the restrictor increases flow in which the fuel will be cooler (the reason TD5s have fuel coolers is that the fuel gets that hot in the head that the fuel can boil in the tank) This will reduce the viscosity of the diesel (most oils when hot are thinner) Having a higher viscosity oil will reduce leakage. ( this mod doesn't stop fuel ingress just slows it)
    1 vehicle that was bad for this it had 4 sets of new injectors. and 2 sets of 2nd hand injectors and had all the different models (black blue and green) 2 heads and a engine change and it still leaked diesel out of the injector plungers.

    If you want to see if yours is leaking from injectors, remove the rocker cover and clean all the oil out of the head around the injector so there is no oil in there. remove fuel pump relay and bridge it out and let the fuel pump run for a hour. You will be supprized how much diesel has pooled around the injectors

    Every TD5 that I have seen that has had a oil sample tested has come back with high fuel dilution. LR say it is with in range.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by woko View Post
    [snip]

    Every TD5 that I have seen that has had a oil sample tested has come back with high fuel dilution. LR say it is with in range.
    Every one ??!!

    Anything above 0.5% (and no lab that I'm aware of in Australia can test below 1.0% ) impacts negatively on engine life as no oil commonly available in Australia can cope with fuel dilution long term.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Blotter Test?

    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Another thing to look for in the blotter test for fuel dilution is a wavy border but it's the rate of the spread that will really tip you off.

    I posted this four years ago in another thread, and while it only shows various containment levels, it'll give you an idea.
    IMO fuel would show up outside the dark rings.



    [edit]
    This is better (from Cummins and Valvoline)



    and this is a good FAQ FAQ's :: Valvoline ::
    Rick,
    Are the pics as above when the oil is dry on the paper (ie after a hour or so when the oil has soaked in) or straight after placement onto the paper?

    Chris

  8. #68
    scott oz Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Every one ??!!

    Anything above 0.5% (and no lab that I'm aware of in Australia can test below 1.0% ) impacts negatively on engine life as no oil commonly available in Australia can cope with fuel dilution long term.
    Last oil test I did (07) came in with fuel contamination of 2%. This was after the injectors were changed? This was down form 6%,4,%,3% taken at 9,000K intervals. I change oil every 10,000K’s.

    Report commented “flash point indicates fuel dilution satisfactory”

    Might get another one done.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cjc_td5 View Post
    Rick,
    Are the pics as above when the oil is dry on the paper (ie after a hour or so when the oil has soaked in) or straight after placement onto the paper?

    Chris
    Chris, I've always taken it as after a minute or two, but bear in mind I'm no expert doing it for a living either.

    The speed of spread is a factor to consider and can be an indicator of fuel

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    Last oil test I did (07) came in with fuel contamination of 2%. This was after the injectors were changed? This was down form 6%,4,%,3% taken at 9,000K intervals. I change oil every 10,000K’s.

    Report commented “flash point indicates fuel dilution satisfactory”

    Might get another one done.
    Lots of short trips can increase fuel dilution just from ring blow by too, the engine doesn't get hot enough to volatise off any fuel that gets past the rings when cold.

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!