Thread: D2 v D1

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

I'm sorry but the ONLY thing rattlers have going for them is fuel economy.

You're obviously familiar with the sound of a can of worms Pedro ...

The Td5 is also much less complex than a petrol V8, both mechanically and electronically. The Td5 has plenty of torque at idle. In fact I find it is better with your foot off the accelerator and let the ECU do all the work.

as the TD5 was an all new design for the D2 and the V8 powered the Ark (only needed one) I dont think that last statement is quite right,,
The fuel system alone on the Td5 has 27 computers to keep all the bits running,,

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

I dont think that last statement is quite right,,
The fuel system alone on the Td5 has 27 computers to keep all the bits running,,

Nope, just one, and it has less to do than the one in the V8! It just puts the fuel in the engine. It doesn't have to tell it when to burn it.

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

as the TD5 was an all new design for the D2 and the V8 powered the Ark (only needed one) I dont think that last statement is quite right,,
The fuel system alone on the Td5 has 27 computers to keep all the bits running,,

Seriously 27! What are you on!

Edited to add, I have both a 2003 v8 and a 2001 td5(def). They are both good, but the V8 is more complicated, and more difficult to work on than the TD5 IME

It is a lot quieter and smoother, but they are really the only 2 advantages of the v8 I can see comparing ours.

personally I prefer to work on the TD5's and I might be able to swing you a drive in my sisters sludgeboxes TD5D2.

some bits for the TD5 are a lot pricier than the same bits for the v8 but then you dont have to replace them as often and you dont fill the td5 up anywhere near as often either.

you also pay less for rego.

sure, the v8 sounds nice but its like politics, the ones that make the best sounds are usually the ones least suited to the job.

Yeah, I think you are right. I need to drive a diesel up a sand hill and see how it performs.

I'm not sold on the idea of addressing maintenance issues on my D1. Unfortunately, when maintenance issues arise, I am usually far from home. I don't like that feeling

The truth is that at nearly 300k the D1 has lots of bits that are now worn and prone to breakage. Not saying that a D2 won't break, just that it will be less likely to break.

I might even keep the D1 as a "play" car and use the D2 for round the city and touring.

Yep, sounds like a plan.

This morning I woke up to my D2 having the leans... Fortunately I have already pre-stocked with a pair of replacement air bags in the garage.

Yesterday I noticed at the traffic lights that the car was pumping up and settling and I thought it odd as I hadn't noticed it before.

Going outside now to work on the D2, isn't that what all LR owners do on a Sunday.

Cheers
Ron

p.s. These are the original bags that are 12 years old and 265Ks.

yeah, because at 290K Km landrovers just start magically falling apart.

no ones ever taken a landy thats more that 10 years old with more than 300k on it anywhere other than the garage to get it fixed.

you should on no account think of taking any landrover thats out of warranty anywhere.

ANY act of taking an old landy anywhere is probably a desperate act of a pitiful fool at the end of his rope (yes, a movie quote).

(surprisingly no, it wasnt the most repaired vehicle on the trip)