Seems like the answer is no - http://www.aulro.com/afvb/discovery-...sor-wires.html
The solution - Expedition Exchange Incorporated :: Discovery :: Discovery II :: SlickRock Fabrication Disco2 ABS Extension Kit (ABS)
With the wiring loom that goes to the ABS/TC sensors at the rear hubs, can I just cut the wires and solder in an extension section? Or would this cause issues with the resistance values of the wire/sensor?
With my 4" lift, they keep undoing at the connection plugs.
Seems like the answer is no - http://www.aulro.com/afvb/discovery-...sor-wires.html
The solution - Expedition Exchange Incorporated :: Discovery :: Discovery II :: SlickRock Fabrication Disco2 ABS Extension Kit (ABS)
When my sensor cable was damaged I joined it using a bullet type crimp, as the wire would not allow solder. I have had no problems since.
I'm not 100% sure why the wire is so special and cannot be soldered, but I suspect it has something to do with it being heavy duty but still small in diameter.
These sensors give a pulse, and the cable itself is not a resistance device, and even if it was, why would a piece of highly conducting copper make any difference at the ECU.
So, I see no reason why a home made copper wire extension would not work. You just wont be able to solder it together.
Please note, these are just my thoughts and are not based on practical experience (other than the crimp lugs).![]()
2002 D2 4.6L V8 Auto SLS+2" ACE CDL Truetrac(F) Nanocom(V8 only)
Different cables and different materials used in cables have varying resistances.
It's common for wire in applications such as this to be the type that solder won't bind to - not sure what about it causes that, but have come across it previously, hence why I started the thread to find out if this was the same deal.
[QUOTE=twr7cx;1639866]Different cables and different materials used in cables have varying resistances.
.........
[QUOTE]
True, but why would inserting a piece of copper wire, with virtually no resistance, in series with a special cable make a difference.
Just thinking out loud here.
Last edited by biggin; 4th March 2012 at 08:46 AM. Reason: more info
2002 D2 4.6L V8 Auto SLS+2" ACE CDL Truetrac(F) Nanocom(V8 only)
[quote=biggin;1639867][QUOTE=twr7cx;1639866]Different cables and different materials used in cables have varying resistances.
.........
Copper wire does have a resistance.
True, but why would inserting a piece of copper wire, with virtually no resistance, in series with a special cable make a difference.
Just thinking out loud here.
The special wire may have a specific resistance, may be lower than that of copper wire.
I have been looking into extending my rear ABS cables as well. I believe the front sensor and cable to the connector in the wheel well is longer than the rear so am thinking of using those.
_________________________
1996 D1 V8 - gone
2002 D2 Td5 ES- gone but still running elsewhere
2013 D4 SDV6 HSE - gone
2023 Defender 110SE D300
Without having a look, it's probably some carbon fibre conductor which is very flexible and wont fatigue and break that easily. More to the point though, is the electrical shielding and the fact the signal from the sensor is probably very small and could possibly be corrupted.
Short of using a design built replacement, l would use some sort of shielded co-axial cable.
Who said it didn't?
Probably better using a dual cored coax.
As I stated below, I joined a broken cable using standard crimp lugs with no problems.
If I joined it using the same crimp lugs with a piece of copper wire in between it would still work, no matter what the original conductor is made of.
Last edited by biggin; 5th March 2012 at 05:04 PM. Reason: more info
2002 D2 4.6L V8 Auto SLS+2" ACE CDL Truetrac(F) Nanocom(V8 only)
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks