Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 93

Thread: Pro/Cons of wider tyres (245 vs 265 on a stock D2)

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    On the road.
    Posts
    1,946
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ^^^^^ that was on 245/75, i would not have got hung up with 235/85!.

  2. #32
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Yorkie View Post
    ^^^^^ that was on 245/75, i would not have got hung up with 235/85!.
    Yes you would.... Makes no difference!

    No matter how high you go you'll drive a track that hits!!!!!!

  3. #33
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Wortho View Post
    A 2in lift will not change what size tyres you can run, if you can run it with a 2in you can run it standard. As the up travel does not change your tyres will still travel up into the guards just as far as before so it's more a matter of how big is your wheel arch, i.e a 33in tyre will not fit in a 32in.
    A 235/85/16 will fit no worrys on a standard D2.
    Also you don't get a wider footprint when you let you tyres down just a longer one.
    You're flogging a dead horse!

    No matter how often this is explained a lot don't get it!


  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wortho View Post
    A 2in lift will not change what size tyres you can run, if you can run it with a 2in you can run it standard. As the up travel does not change your tyres will still travel up into the guards just as far as before so it's more a matter of how big is your wheel arch, i.e a 33in tyre will not fit in a 32in.
    A 235/85/16 will fit no worrys on a standard D2.
    Also you don't get a wider footprint when you let you tyres down just a longer one.
    So what your saying is I'm the same height standing on my head as standing on my feet?

    Happy Days.

  5. #35
    schuy1 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Yorkie View Post
    thank you for your comment oh wise one, now off you pop.

    I think my comment has just been reinforced by the posting of that pic!! That is a track for a unimog!
    Cheers Scott

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    On the road.
    Posts
    1,946
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by schuy1 View Post
    I think my comment has just been reinforced by the posting of that pic!! That is a track for a unimog!
    Cheers Scott
    no its not, your just not trying hard enough.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Medowie N.S.W
    Posts
    494
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Quote:


    Originally
    Posted by Wortho


    A 2in lift will not change what size tyres you can run, if you can run it
    with a 2in you can run it standard. As the up travel does not change your tyres
    will still travel up into the guards just as far as before so it's more a matter
    of how big is your wheel arch, i.e a 33in tyre will not fit in a 32in.


    A 235/85/16 will fit no worrys on a standard D2.


    Also you don't get a wider footprint when you let you tyres down just a
    longer one.


    So what your saying is I'm the same height standing on my head as standing on
    my feet?





    Happy Days.


    Technically you would think that would make you two feet higher

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    235/85/16 need a camel cut to not rub I thought (from all the reading I have done - although I must admit my head is starting to hurt now!).

    Anyway, think I am going to go with 245/75 - I'm still new to 4wd so want to give those sort of tracks a try but not trash the car and roof tent. It's not banging so much as the scraping of the diff guards

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    You're flogging a dead horse!

    No matter how often this is explained a lot don't get it!

    I'm still slightly confused TBH - is the point that with a lift you get more articulation so even though a larger tyre might rub with no lift it will take a little longer to with a lift, i.e. you have to go over a bigger bump before it catches?

  10. #40
    Tombie Guest
    Get a piece of paper.

    Draw a big dot in the middle.
    Rule a line across the page through the dot.
    "This is the bottom of your vehicle"

    Now get a compass. Pin on the dot and swing an arc with a 80mm radius from the line downward.

    This is the arc of your suspension.

    The line being the limit of "up" travel.

    Now lets say std height is 25mm lower than the chassis (line) - rule a parallel line through the arc at 25mm below the existing line. This will be 'static height when stock'

    Now to simulate a lift rule a line through the arc (parallel to the others) 10mm lower.

    This displays the *static* height with a lift.

    If in this example maximum travel down is with the suspension at 45° from horizontal draw this line from the centre dot you first drew.

    This section now represents the arc of travel, regardless of static height.

    Under load or compression off road the suspension can still move through this entire arc.

    So if it rubs at std height, it will with a lift.

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!