Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 93

Thread: Pro/Cons of wider tyres (245 vs 265 on a stock D2)

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bejoording WA, 6566
    Posts
    124
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interstingly he said Rio Tinto still specify Coopers for their minesites, which may not accord with some comments here.[/QUOTE]

    That is interesting, Ive had my Cooper STT's on for just on 60,000 ks and they've been all over the Pilbarra, with numerous trips from Meekatharra to Wiluna ( About as rough as it gets), about 6 months straight on a new camp at Area C and a couple of trips tp Pumnu ( About 150 Ks East of Telfer and a whole host of other mine and construction sites. I'd estimate somewhere between 17-18000 was on dirt roads.

    Never had a flat and still have about 9mm of tread.

    Can't say that about the tyres we had on some of the utes (see picture)
    I'm not sure what they were but the 3 letters I can see in the photo are DUE. These done about 12000 ks from new to kaput
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm pretty keen to give BF Goodrich MT a try next set. I currently have Cooper S/T the old ones not the MAXX. They aren't that good in mud, as I found out yesterday.

    I dont want anything too open spaced as I know it will effect fuel economy. I have run Mick T MTZ on a 75 Series ute and they added another 2 L / 100km.

    Happy Days.

  3. #83
    infrno Guest
    Bumping this one again with an option I haven't seen yet.

    From what I've seen the 235's are skittish at speed (which I'm definitely experiencing on my disco to a point at times of it being dangerous) - 245's are a great improvement and 265's run the risk of rubbing on standard height.

    Looking at the BFG Muddies they have a 255/70/16 option - has anyone had any experience with those?

    Keen on thoughts - I need to re-shoe this thing this week before heading to Melbourne on Thursday night.

    Cheers,

    Michael.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by infrno View Post
    Bumping this one again with an option I haven't seen yet.

    From what I've seen the 235's are skittish at speed (which I'm definitely experiencing on my disco to a point at times of it being dangerous) - 245's are a great improvement and 265's run the risk of rubbing on standard height.

    Looking at the BFG Muddies they have a 255/70/16 option - has anyone had any experience with those?

    Keen on thoughts - I need to re-shoe this thing this week before heading to Melbourne on Thursday night.

    Cheers,

    Michael.
    I went with Toyo MTs in 245/75 - they are a big 245 by diameter and seem to give the best of both worlds IMHO.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    On the road.
    Posts
    1,946
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My local Bridgestone dealer can get the new muddies in 245/70/16
    Lt, $214ea, that's my next set.

    D674

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberto View Post
    I like the look of the 245 75 16s with a 2" lift. The tyre fills the wheel well nicely. The D2 looks as if it is perfectly balanced with the 2" lift. Un lifted cars look somehow disproportionate. But a lift without bigger tyres looks bad too. I also favour the narrower 245 over the 265 - wide tyres look a bit like they belong on a hot hilux rather than a serious off road tourer. The 245 STs and STTs have both performed admirably in desert conditions (dunes and tracks).
    Yep...245/75 is the best size for off road on an unlifted d2 in my opinion. Always go higher profile versus width.

    Cheers

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mrapocalypse View Post
    265/75/16 and why not get a 2" lift..... ? Great mod!


    Wouldn't that be considerably over the 50mm total lift allowed? ?

    Cheers

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Posts
    750
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In NSW it seems they (RMS) are still only allowing a 15mm larger tyre/wheel combo than standard. Any word if this is likely to change like vic and queensland?
    Regards

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You should go to the Regs but here is Mickey Thompson's website referring to a 2 inch increase in Qld.

    Cheers

    Mickey Thompson Tires - Article

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Posts
    1,722
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by infrno View Post
    From what I've seen the 235's are skittish at speed (which I'm definitely experiencing on my disco to a point at times of it being dangerous)
    I've been running 235/85r16 Hankook MT-03's for a few years now and never had that "skittish" feeling.
    If anything, I way prefer them over the "fatter" tyres - cut through mud better, deflate to a better footprint, and lifts my diff off so I can get up and down those urban kerbs better!

    There's a reason why the G4 D2's used the skinny 225/75r16 MT/R.....

    My 2c anyway!

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!