They are different because the calibration of each sensor will be different.
You may find it leans a little now depending on how different they were to begin with!
To set the height the use of calibration blocks on the back axle is used..
I was going through the Nanocom the other day and noted that the ride height numbers were different( left to right). I set both to 158 or something like that.
My question is , what is the correct or safe height?
The car is used for towing occasionally but is most used on the road.
Regards Nick.
They are different because the calibration of each sensor will be different.
You may find it leans a little now depending on how different they were to begin with!
To set the height the use of calibration blocks on the back axle is used..
Bugger and , thanks.
does anyone have any idea of a numerical amount ie. 157 or 149 etc on the nanocom? as a norm.
As tombie said, the numbers on the left and right will be different due to individual sensor calibration, for this same reason you cannot use the ride height settings from another vehicle and expect them to be relevant to your vehicle.
SLS Calibration blocks are best but if in doubt you can always climb under and measure the distance between bump stop and axle. Make adjustments ( not when under vehicle) and measure again etc. a bit crude but worked for me.
X2 , but, you can measure on a flat surface from ground to top of wheel arch if you can't be bothered climbing under the car
Can I add to this question, I've just refitted SLS (call me crazy). What is the difference between the target height in the settings, and the sls calibration in the utility section?
Sent from my HTC_0P6B using AULRO mobile app
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks