Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: D2 Fuel Economy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0

    D2 Fuel Economy

    A couple of weeks ago i did this modification to my exhaust manifold


    Since then the fuel economy has improved dramaticly, our towing economy has gone from averaging 15l/100k to low 13s per 100k and the non towing tank is on it's way to being the best ever, so far with 260ks on the clock the needle has only got to a 1/4, this is for us, amazing.

    Factor in larger tyres, roof racks with an awning, pole carrier, shovel, drawers and this is amazing, the biggest killer to fuel economy are the bigger tyres and roof rack.

    I think it is a number of things that has improved our economy, the heat at the manifold has been reduced, all the gaskets are new, the manifold is finally attached properly with no leaks and is not warped, something i feel that the standard size studs weren't doing the job and were braking soon after being replaced and over time the manifold was warping, i think the bigger studs i had put in are doing a far better job than the standard TD5 manifold studs, because after replacing the studs before we never noticed this big of an improvement, there was a slight improvement but that soon dropped off over the first week.

    Not only has our economy improved but also the power has too, it is pulling right off the bottom at around 1400rpm, instead of 1900rpm when the turbo kicks in, no more slipping the clutch while keeping the revs up around 3000rpm

    So from this i would recommend that all owners of chipped TD5s do this mod if your having problems with the exhaust manifold warping and broken studs on a regular basis, which for ours was evry 6mths or so.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Heidelberg, Melbourne
    Posts
    673
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Baz,

    Does your D2 also have the Catalytic converter? Mine does but apparently some D2's don't. By all accounts this is also a major restriction that should be removed? Unsure of the legalities though?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    perth western australia
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillWilde View Post
    G'day Baz,

    Does your D2 also have the Catalytic converter? Mine does but apparently some D2's don't. By all accounts this is also a major restriction that should be removed? Unsure of the legalities though?
    Totally illegal to remove catalytic converters as far as emission laws go although you can get a High Flow Cat to reduce back pressure which helps greatly as far as turboed engines go

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    738
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Baz,

    Forgive my ignorance (I'm not very technical) - what exactly did you do? Don'y know what the manifold looked like b4 so it's hard to comprehend what you did.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillWilde View Post
    G'day Baz,

    Does your D2 also have the Catalytic converter? Mine does but apparently some D2's don't. By all accounts this is also a major restriction that should be removed? Unsure of the legalities though?
    It's a TD5 not a V8

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken View Post
    Totally illegal to remove catalytic converters as far as emission laws go although you can get a High Flow Cat to reduce back pressure which helps greatly as far as turboed engines go
    AS ABOVE

    Quote Originally Posted by Franz View Post
    Baz,

    Forgive my ignorance (I'm not very technical) - what exactly did you do? Don'y know what the manifold looked like b4 so it's hard to comprehend what you did.
    Franz it looks like this


    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,006
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Franz,

    Baz has removed the webbing from the manifold. The manifold is cast and during manufacture there are webs between the ports. Baz has circled the shiny bits.

    The fuel economy most likely would have come from all the new gaskets and the proper sealing of the exhaust manifold.

    P.S.....stuff you Baz I must not let work get in the way when on this forum

    Cheers.
    Last edited by feral; 15th February 2008 at 02:18 PM. Reason: Too slow or too much work!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    738
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Feral View Post
    Franz,

    Baz has removed the webbing from the manifold. The manifold is cast and during manufacture there are webs between the ports. Baz has circled the shiny bits.

    The fuel economy most likely would have come from all the new gaskets and the proper sealing of the exhaust manifold.

    P.S.....stuff you Baz I must not let work get in the way when on this forum

    Cheers.
    Thanks Feral.

    Would removing the webbing make for a better (non leaky) fit? I did see the shiny bits but did not know there was webbibg there - Baz's b4 picture explained that.

    If that's what it takes to improve fuel economy, I was going to break out the angle grinder (although that looks more like a die grinder job!)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    738
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Feral View Post
    Franz,

    Baz has removed the webbing from the manifold. The manifold is cast and during manufacture there are webs between the ports. Baz has circled the shiny bits.

    The fuel economy most likely would have come from all the new gaskets and the proper sealing of the exhaust manifold.

    P.S.....stuff you Baz I must not let work get in the way when on this forum

    Cheers.
    Baz,

    I haver no noticeable increase in fuel consumption when running the 265/75's - There might be a difference in the hard stuff but I never use my standard tyres off road and therefore have no basis for comparison.

    On road, I have no discernable difference in my fuel consumption when running 265/75's.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Heidelberg, Melbourne
    Posts
    673
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    It's a TD5 not a V8



    AS ABOVE



    Franz it looks like this


    Baz.
    Baz, my D2 is a TD5 also mate, a 2001 model like yours i believe, and mine has a catalytic converter just after the banjo joint on the exhaust.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some Disco II TD5s have the convertor, some don't. As a matter of interest, the non convertor engine pipe is a direct bolt in replacement for the convertor type, and is a LOT cheaper. I think the TD5 would pass the relevant emission tests regardless of whether it had the convertor or not (but that is my opinion, not a fact). As far as I know, the Australian standard of the day was a lot less strict than the Euro equivelant.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!