Thread: Ineos Grenadier, do you reckon it'll take off?

We “hear “ lots of things. Got any links or references? Grenadiers can’t cross dry creek beds, based on what we “hear”.

Originally Posted by sashadidi

hmm the ford engine mighht not be a long term bet based on what I hear...

NVES will probably put an end to it in Aus.

Unfortunately,NVES,in it's current form,will put an end to lots of things in the new vehicle market,and will give some vehicle maufacturers huge headaches, if it isn't changed, modified or disbanded.

They'll need to sell a whole lot more Mach-E Mustangs than they do now to offset it. But nobody wants those.

Originally Posted by Tins

They'll need to sell a whole lot more Mach-E Mustangs than they do now to offset it. But nobody wants those.

Unfortunately,that is the issue for Ford.
Their big seller is the Ranger,not much else.And the TDV6 is the most popular engine.More so now the bi turbo has been dropped,and the TDV6 is available in more Ranger models.
They sell quite a few Everests,but they won't help either.Maybe a hybrid will appear,but no doubt they will have the same issue as the Prado,where to put the hybrid battery,etc.

Sure they have a hybrid Ranger,but it needs to sell in droves,i don't think it will.

Like i have said before,the SD dodges NVES,so it will keep numbers up to some extent,depending how it sells.

Ford also have the problem,like all ute manufacturers,of all these Chinese utes knocking on their door.

There was no link in my post. It would take effort on the part of those interested to see the You Tube article.
It was and is a suggestion to obtain the truth of a situation that appears to have possibly misled a number of members.
Would the moderator prefer that posters are kept ignorant of the facts of the situation?
Censorship seems to be alive and well. Are you suggesting that sites can be mutually exclusive? I am pretty sure that many members of this forum also (oh shock Horror) look at the Cadogan site notwithstanding some words that Presidents now use.

Regards PhilipA

Originally Posted by PhilipA

There was no link in my post. It would take effort on the part of those interested to see the You Tube article.
It was and is a suggestion to obtain the truth of a situation that appears to have possibly misled a number of members.
Would the moderator prefer that posters are kept ignorant of the facts of the situation?
Censorship seems to be alive and well. Are you suggesting that sites can be mutually exclusive? I am pretty sure that many members of this forum also (oh shock Horror) look at the Cadogan site notwithstanding some words that Presidents now use.

Regards PhilipA

Sadly, and the only real downside of this forum is the censorship , that was proved beyond doubt a few years ago with certain discussions about medical procedures and science

@PhilipA I don't think Brad was referring to you, as someone posted the actual link after your post. Cadogan is funny and offers some frank advice. I like how he refers to Merc's three pointed star as a three prong somehow equating it with Satan's trident as often pictured in popular culture.

Yeah, just to clarify there's no issue with "Check out the latest John Cadogan video on the topic". Just an issue with posting a direct "click here, or remove the space to get to the link" sort of things.

Anyway, back to the topic. It looks like John was supplied a small cache of evidence from Ineos directly which I thought was pretty clear. Sounds like the original reporter and owner were somewhat economical with the truth. On the other hand perhaps Hanlons razor applies.