Printable View
Absolutely incredible, Disco Muppet. The truth behind all these mysteries revealed on AULRO before it has even been made up on 'Prison Planet' or 'Before It's News'. Those guys will have to lift their game if they are to remain the alternative news sites of choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Muppet
That's what you get when you go to group therapy with the uncle of the bartender where a former CIA agent's cousin goes.
Doesn't get much more valid than that.
Sent from my HTC One using AULRO mobile app
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryO
And despite the comments from the "usual suspects" who continue to admit the probable.
They continue to discount the original & "admitted" original tapes which even mentioning the person who actually CONFIRMED they'd shot down this aircraft. Those tapes have miraculously disappeared.
I ain't blaming the Russians here, not at all, they simply supplied the weapon, like the U.S. & many countries do. They would have trained the operatives,...like the U.S. do!!
However, I believe that it was a Russian Missile, I think that's generally believed, (but not by some on here!) that was launched by Russian Backed Ukrainian Rebels. The Rocket Launcher was seen entering the area, & was seen leaving,.......with only three missiles in place,...instead of the four that it was seen with when entering the area.
I believe all this will be well & truly be able to be proven. So no, Russians did not launch it. No direct blame to them,...that blame lies with the Ukrainian rebels.
It will be interesting to see how far the Netherlands & Australia are willing to go to prove this.
All, IMHO, of course. Pickles.
i more meant its easier to ignore any evidence and simply blame big bad russia.
if it was near korea, the report would say big bad north korea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Muppet
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferret
barmy the lot of you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Muppet
it was COL. Mustard in the lavatory with the scatter gun...
look. you may be correct you may not be. but you are not Russian and have absolutely NO idea how they work internally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eevo
you have not lived in Russia, you have not had dealings with Russians.
there are second generation Russians in Adelaide, university students, smart kids. who believe that all Australian news is american propaganda. last week i had a conversation with a 28 year-old girl who i have known for a number of years, she has finished her PHD in physiology and is now working for the family courts ( federal) who stood in front of me and stated that the Crimean and Ukrainian conflict was a Jewish plot!!!!
the look at Putins Australian speech, do a page 8 on it and actually READ the friggen thing
first intresting part
Minister Kerensky, the Head of the Provisional Government [in 1917], visited here. Even more surprising is the fact that he went on to marry an Australian journalist. This is a sort of unnatural union, even for a former Prime Minister. I don't know exactly why he did it. Perhaps he was overcome by grief after losing power, in a state of temporary insanity. Or maybe this is just the result of some internal disposition that led him from one mistake to another: first he lost power, then he lost it again.
read it as an Australian you think its funny, read it as a Russian, Australia hardboard or gave sanctuary to an enemy of the soviet state, he was mad Australia is mad, thus Australia is of no value.
second interesting bit
every name/ person and one ship has a meaning, every thing from we proved Capitan cook wrong ( thus we have as much right to you as England has) to Australia full of short hair blue eyes of suspect sexual orientation.
Bollocks, it was a rail gun, and he was caught on utubeQuote:
Originally Posted by Blknight.aus
It has been established beyond reasonable doubt it was a missile. The BUK has a 70 kg warhead, the explosion tore the front of the aircraft completely off. Fragments from the explosion were found in some of the bodies, [ those in the forward section, apparently] The only mystery is who fired it? Both the Ukraine and Russia had the BUK.
9K37 BUK-M1 SA-11 Gadfly technical data sheet specifications information description pictures photos | Russia Russian missile system vehicle UK | Russia Russian army military equipment vehicles UK
while the Ukraine has BUK systems, they are not really operational, lack of parts and age. Most people do not realise that the BUK system is more than one vehicles.. its proper use it 3 vehicles. IE two other radar systems working in conjuction.
the Ukraine has however over 100 9A33 systems. this is a self contatined one vehicle system. If the Ukraine felt the need to deploy air defence it would be this unit. but more manageable than the BUK.
the 9A33, system is much more compact in all respects, more manoeuvrable and with a lighter payload. as a result it uses a mixture of exploding ordnance and flichets in it warhead. this fact alone discounts it use in this case.
secondly one must ask, since the Ukraine rebels have no air asserts. why would the Ukraine deploy air defence?
on the other hand the Ukraine had deployed air assets against the rebels, thus the rebels needed air defence.
secondly. where the aircraft was hit was out of range given the front lines at that time.
so in short it really is a no brainier. it is of no consequence where th BUK unit originally came from, picked up by the Russians in the Ukraine possible, but really i have no idea. ether way it makes no difference, what is important is who pulled the trigger. and then there is what was there intentions. i firmly believe that because only one missile was launched which is not SOP. which to me indicates that the system was not operated by well trained personnel. since there in no political, millatery advantage to shooting down an airliner, and the fact that the Ukraine had an aircraft active at that time and had previously losed an aircraft to a BUK system. that the downing of the Malaysian airline was an operator error.
And that, has been the general opinion of those who know these things, right from the start. The intercepted comms. between the rebels stating they had shot down a military aircraft, then the shock of the men on the ground when they discovered it was civilian ,should be enough to put the local rebel commander away for a very long time, just for a start.