Whatever happened the aircraft only flew for 30 seconds. There were either no flaps set, or very minimal. (5?) No way that full flaps would retract in the time that the aircraft was off the ground.
If someone switched flaps up instead of gear up, it would not be something as simple as wrong switch. But both operations (gear up and flaps up) are part of the normal procedures after takeoff, so it is conceivable that a flustered pilot could be mentally at the wrong place in the checklist, but this seems unlikely unless something else had really gone wrong.
(I am not sure of the normal procedure for this plane, but typically gear up is as soon as the plane is airborne and you have a stable climb, and flaps will be retracted , usually in stages, as airspeed increases, but this is very dependent on the aircraft and the airport and company procedures.)
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
 Wizard
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SupporterWhatever happened the aircraft only flew for 30 seconds. There were either no flaps set, or very minimal. (5?) No way that full flaps would retract in the time that the aircraft was off the ground.
another angle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3H...el=10NewsFirst
i think that makes engine failure more likley
Current Cars:
2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
2008 RRS, TDV8
1995 VS Clubsport
Previous Cars:
2008 ML63, V8
2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion
The only thing really clear in that vid that I can see is the gear was down. Can't really see the flaps, but that could be telling in itself as they are big items. The climb out never seems stable to me, but that could simply be my own projection. Pity there was no sound.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
Never seen this guy before. I'm putting this here FYI.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
Of course, it's all speculation, but the hardest thing to understand, at least for me, is why all the redundancies built in could fail, if indeed they did. That last vid mentions a MAYDAY call. Doesn't rule out pilot error, doesn't imply it either.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
 Wizard
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SupporterIn that last video he says that there are 3 ways that the RAT can deploy. What he doesn't say is that it can also be deployed manually.
 Wizard
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SupporterAlthough I still look at this place from time to time, it becomes clogged up with basic BS from would be experts. I will post the following as it presents a new angle, albeit not from a pilot:
Plane crash near Ahmedabad.. - Page 60 - PPRuNe Forums
poster: SpaceQuality
Boeing TCMA Patent US6704630B2
There is one system implemented in the 787, that has the authority to shut down the engines, based on software subsystem decision. Interestingly - according to the description in the patent below - the same TCMA software package determines the shutdown decision, in both redundant subsystems.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks