Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45

Thread: Castor correction & uni's

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I will have to take some photos of my pinion angles. Stock and current. You will see the standard uni angles on a range rover are pretty much perfectly setup for a DC style shaft running in phase.

    Also if you don't have to modify the standard cross member then your not getting much out of the suspension. I have had to remove over 2 inches of meat from my round crossmember just to clear the drive shaft on full droop.
    The cranked arms make about 2mm of difference at the crossmember (fug all really). The minute difference to the running angle at the tcase end of the shaft is negligable (I would be interested to check the angles aswell to see how much it is changed/affected, my guess would be a total of 1.36 degrees ).

    At the end of the day, I love my cranked arms and personally would never do it differently!
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Everything in the thread is about created problems from lifts which is a reality of modifications and like slotted balls or cranked arms, DC joints are part of the fix and also there is no mention of budgets.
    Spot on dude!

    Cranked arms are relatively cheap IMHO (can get em out of the states for the same cost of slotted swivels). In my case they were more expensive (about 1100 ), mine are one piece construction and engineered.
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,428
    Total Downloaded
    0
    CC the discussion according to the first post is about castor correction, slotted balls, cranked arms and pinion heights, angles and clearances. Everything in the thread is about created problems from lifts which is a reality of modifications and like slotted balls or cranked arms, DC joints are part of the fix and also there is no mention of budgets.
    Thats it

    I'm starting to go nuts with my rangie.. has 4" lift. Put 3 degree caster bushes in the front arms (GQ diff so can't rotate swivels). Rangie sits on the road great now. But the bushes caused too much driveshaft angle at the transfer. Spent 800 bucks on new driveshafts with larger unis which hardly made a difference

    Now I have to go down the road of DC shafts (not cheap)

    Camo
    2004 Black Range Rover L322 Diesel

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Camo View Post
    Thats it

    I'm starting to go nuts with my rangie.. has 4" lift. Put 3 degree caster bushes in the front arms (GQ diff so can't rotate swivels). Rangie sits on the road great now. But the bushes caused too much driveshaft angle at the transfer. Spent 800 bucks on new driveshafts with larger unis which hardly made a difference

    Now I have to go down the road of DC shafts (not cheap)

    Camo
    Camo, I want to have a look at your shaft angles sometime to assess where the vibes are coming from.

    Larger unis won't change a thing, if there is a phasing issue between both unis you will get a vibration.

    I would guess your new shaft is running in phase on the splines and that your differential pinion is pointing up towards the tcase output (not parralel). If this is the case you need to remove your front shaft and rotate the spilnes 45degrees out of phase (as per rover standard) to corect the misalignment in the uni angles.
    You might have to fine tune it a spline or two to get it right but it is possible.

    Also have a look at the transmission mounts as they flog out quickly when subjected to such vibrations.

    I am keen to give you a hand and getting this sorted for you, as with new shafts (even non DC) and a 4" lift you should be able to enjoy smooth shafting

    EDIT: Obviously if the uni at the differential end is dead flat, then phase changing wont make a difference and a DC shaft is the only answer. But thats is highly unlikely and you should get an improvement from doing the above.
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    I am lost
    Posts
    1,766
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Camo View Post
    Thats it

    I'm starting to go nuts with my rangie.. has 4" lift. Put 3 degree caster bushes in the front arms (GQ diff so can't rotate swivels). Rangie sits on the road great now. But the bushes caused too much driveshaft angle at the transfer. Spent 800 bucks on new driveshafts with larger unis which hardly made a difference

    Now I have to go down the road of DC shafts (not cheap)

    Camo
    hey Camo
    i carry a spare front dc shaft which has just been rebuilt and balanced at gibbs trucks very recently, if you want to put it in to see if it stops the vibes then at least you know it works before spending the money ,i am sure it will fit
    cheers kelvin

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,428
    Total Downloaded
    0
    4" lift you should be able to enjoy smooth shafting
    LOL I like the sound of that

    Will give you a call during the week to show you my shafts.. Keen to get this sorted..what ever it takes I guess

    Cheers Grimace

    Camo
    2004 Black Range Rover L322 Diesel

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Front crossmember

    Grimace,

    Surprised you had to mod your round crossmember as they're not too bad, the square ones you would for a big lift because it's a bit more tucked up into the chassis.

    This is why I steer away from big lifts myself, you're always chasing your tail and it can drive you mad costing a pretty packet at the end of it. But each to there own and not many people go through Rangies like I do (takes me a while to find the 'right' one).

    Trav

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by aquarangie View Post
    Grimace,

    Surprised you had to mod your round crossmember as they're not too bad, the square ones you would for a big lift because it's a bit more tucked up into the chassis.

    Trav
    Yeah I didn't think I would need to remove that much (I only took 2" out of my square crossmember in previous rangies).
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Piggabeen (Tweed Heads)
    Posts
    2,930
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Cat amongst the pidgeons

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimace View Post
    Yeah I didn't think I would need to remove that much (I only took 2" out of my square crossmember in previous rangies).
    Ok class
    I run a standard 85 model square crossmember and a 4" lift with standard wide yoke shaft. The shaft misses the crossmember by a couple of mm on full articulation. So I run 610mm full extension pin to pin shocks. You guys must be using bigger shocks or our RRC is a freak Although cranked arms would increase the down angle of the shaft I suppose. Is this why ??????

    Justin

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DRanged View Post
    Ok class
    I run a standard 85 model square crossmember and a 4" lift with standard wide yoke shaft. The shaft misses the crossmember by a couple of mm on full articulation. So I run 610mm full extension pin to pin shocks. You guys must be using bigger shocks or our RRC is a freak Although cranked arms would increase the down angle of the shaft I suppose. Is this why ??????

    Justin
    Hmm odd, I would have expected yours to hit that crossmember, exspecially with 610mm shocks (is that base of pin to base of pin?).

    IIRC my front Bilsteins are approx 650mm base of pin to base of pin so not much longer (405 compressed with a stroke of just 9.6" or 245mm).

    Running standard driveshafts and cranked arms you loose about 2mm of clearance at the crossmember.
    In my case I actually have not lost any clearance as the aftermarket DC joint protrudes further than a single uni, hence moving the shaft out and away from the crossmember (but only a very small amount).

    I have found all my rangies to foul on the sqaure crossmember. This is my first modification to a round crossmember so can't really compare it with anything else.
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!