Its almost as boring as reading the same thing...'tyres let the vehicle down'...that is the prime/only reason it doesn't win every award for its class.
Its almost as boring as reading the same thing...'tyres let the vehicle down'...that is the prime/only reason it doesn't win every award for its class.
Yep - but if the writers keep saying it maybe LR will listen (or at least listen with the new Deefer based on the LR3 platorm) to good advice...especially for those of us who like to take our trucks to deep soft sand and tow through it.
Cheers
1998 Defender
2008 Madigan
2010 Cape York
2012 Beadell, Bombs and other Blasts
2014 Centreing the Simpson
VKS-737 mob 7669
Fellas on ethe other forum I go to claim that LR has huge advertising dollars spent to "win" all these awards....
and this from Toyota drivers....
cracks me up !
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
Whats the other forum Vlad - I might join up and add some much needed LR weight.
Cheers
Non land rover bias aside the D4 is a better vehicle. More economical, more comfortable, more included for you dollar. I'd rather have a mid spec D4 SE turbo diesel as opposed to a base model 200 series diesel for the same money.
Matt
The 4wd Zone/Opposite Lock Bathurst
263 Stewart Street, Bathurst, NSW
http://www.the4wdzone.com.au/
Discounts for AULRO members, just shoot me a PM before you purchase.
Perhaps if toyotas didnt have to spend their advertising budget on vehicle recalls they could buy an award ??
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks