Its very obvious that my D2 has HIDs... The light assemblies are pure white as you drive towards the vehicle...
However - they
will not dazzle you driving towards me...
This is the difference - My HID kit is a very expensive, quality kit...
The H4 bulbs are properly mounted, have the correct range of movement to focus correctly on both low and high - and are consistent in their positioning from low to high, and have a cut off to prevent glaring up into oncoming traffics eyes...
Interestingly lots of people quote the curve of the arc... Poor positioning etc... Its miniscule - and can be adjusted out - not to mention heat (ambient & generated) in both lamp unit and globes of both types will move and influence the positioning of the filament / arc within the reflector.
A filament inside a conventional bulb when on rough terrain moves - wobbles if you will - up and down - you can see it if your eyes are sensitive enough. Cant maintain focus in that condition...
NOW - a basic H4...
I've had a Philips, Narva and Hansa bulb side by side...
All are H4 units
All had different windings on the filament one was 18 coils, another 15 coils and one had 13 coils
A rudimentary measurement shows the start point for the filaments to be varied by 1-3mm between bulbs...
This quite often explains the misalignment often seen in vehicle headlights...
I have no doubt, that ANY bulb not correctly designed, built or 'focused' will perform badly with scattered light everywhere..
But a correctly positioned light source within the same housing will not, can not produce scattered light...
Arguing against HID through and suggesting the +50 and +75 and +100 lights are better is like arguing in the "Does God exist" thread...
The same sources used to shoot down a HID conversion also state that the "Plus Light" globes are a sham.... So make your choice....
Me... Well like BMKal.. I will continue to run them in my vehicle - which has never been flashed... And will no longer be wading into these discussions..
Bookmarks