Thread: yank rubbish

Originally Posted by roverfan

The xj was available as a 2wd it's not a new phenomenon

I also had a '70 J3000 truck in the late eighties, early nineties as my work truck and it was 2wd too, (found out it was one of three imported in 1970 for a mining job) and I'm pretty sure the Jeepster was 2wd back in the fifties but they seemed to be the exception to the rule.

Originally Posted by PAT303

Like Land Rovers Jeeps have excellent offroad gear that can be bought over the counter,I know 6-7 owners in Newman and one nurse I work with has a very tidy Rubicon. Pat

I wish LR had the range of AM stuff Jeeps have

Originally Posted by garrycol

So you are saying a standard D1 with its long travel suspension is better offroad than a standard D4 with its much shorter travel suspension but with its traction aids in place in the same circumstances.

Id like to see the comparison of the D4 and a new 1974 RRC....tyre grip and compound being equal

Turn off the electrickery in the D4 to make it really interesting.....

Sure and the RRC cannot use its CDL.

Originally Posted by bacicat2000

My neighbour bought a new Jeep late last year - he has trouble driving it between servo's because it is so thirsty... It has a 6 cylinder petrol engine (not sure of its capacity) and he is struggling to get 15L per 100KM out of it.

I wish I could get that sort of economy. That's pretty good compared to my P38A's 20-21 litres/100km.

Originally Posted by uninformed

Id like to see the comparison of the D4 and a new 1974 RRC....tyre grip and compound being equal

D3-4,L322RR etc would eat any live axle LR before it,and any of the competition. Pat

Originally Posted by PAT303

D3-4,L322RR etc would eat any live axle LR before it,and any of the competition. Pat

I think you might find the gap closer than you think. Traction control is great but it isnt vertical take off.....Remember im talking about the original soft sprung, load leveled rear Suspension, lightest RR built. Ground clearence will come into it.