Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Stupid, Irresponsible Headline!!!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,787
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A FOUR-YEAR-OLD boy has died after he was allegedly hit by a car in South Morang on Saturday.

    Is there any doubt that the unfortunate little fellow was hit by a car?

    Condolences to the young chap's family.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  2. #12
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    A FOUR-YEAR-OLD boy has died after he was allegedly hit by a car in South Morang on Saturday.

    Is there any doubt that the unfortunate little fellow was hit by a car?

    Condolences to the young chap's family.
    The use of "allegedly" simply means that the journalist (or his editor) recognises that there may be a court case involved. If this court case has a jury, this weasel word enables them to avoid the accusation of influencing the jury, and possible civil action. I can remember being puzzled by it as a child, so it is not new!

    On the actual incident, while reading this thread, it struck me that, as Craig says, the result would have been the same regardless of the type of vehicle. In fact, children have been being run over and killed by vehicles, from horses to wagons since records have been made. The difference today is that while road deaths of children have dropped and are still dropping, unlike most of history, most children (in this country at least) survive all risks to become adults, so we feel accidental deaths much more strongly.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Gippsland - Victoria
    Posts
    2,907
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What was a 4 yo doing on the street at 9.30pm ?

    Deano

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,787
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The use of "allegedly" simply means that the journalist (or his editor) recognises that there may be a court case involved. If this court case has a jury, this weasel word enables them to avoid the accusation of influencing the jury, and possible civil action. I can remember being puzzled by it as a child, so it is not new!

    On the actual incident, while reading this thread, it struck me that, as Craig says, the result would have been the same regardless of the type of vehicle. In fact, children have been being run over and killed by vehicles, from horses to wagons since records have been made. The difference today is that while road deaths of children have dropped and are still dropping, unlike most of history, most children (in this country at least) survive all risks to become adults, so we feel accidental deaths much more strongly.

    John
    John, I understand the meaning of 'allegedly', but if this incident does end up in court it would surely be to determine the culpability if any of the driver; not whether or not the child was hit by the car.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    CNS, FNQ
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I re-read the article and see my error

    Hay Ewe

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!