Page 14 of 17 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 163

Thread: The rich get richer.... Poor get...

  1. #131
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,919
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Was living in Newcastle at the time and yes, there is and was large differences in housing prices across the country.
    2024 RRS on the road
    2011 D4 3.0 in the drive way
    1999 D2 V8, in heaven
    1984 RRC, in hell

  2. #132
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    20,998
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Our place was $41000 in 2005.Not the Ritz by any means,but it aint a dump either.
    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  3. #133
    Tombie Guest
    Mum and Dads first house cost $9800.00 in a new development.

    3 br, dbl brick... 1/4 acre block.
    20 minutes from Adelaide CBD

    This was 1971

    My first car cost more than the house!

  4. #134
    Tombie Guest
    Let's face it... Property values are completely out of control, and not realistic.

  5. #135
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Mum and Dads first house cost $9800.00 in a new development.

    3 br, dbl brick... 1/4 acre block.
    20 minutes from Adelaide CBD

    This was 1971

    My first car cost more than the house!
    yeah, my grandmothers place was 4k. not sure what year though.

  6. #136
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Mum and Dads first house cost $9800.00 in a new development.

    3 br, dbl brick... 1/4 acre block.
    20 minutes from Adelaide CBD

    This was 1971

    My first car cost more than the house!
    At the end of 1970 I remember that a Ford Falcon 500 XW cost $3500.00, so more than 1/3 of the cost of your parents house.

  7. #137
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Let's face it... Property values are completely out of control, and not realistic.
    too many "investment" properties.

    need to do what singapore has done.

    first house, no stamp duty
    second house (aka investment property), 50% stamp duty

    basically makes it very easy to get a house (as it should be)
    makes it very expensive to buy a second house..

  8. #138
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In 1980 we paid $32,000 for our 3x1 house. Petrol was about 37 cents/litre and I'd sold my 'new' Holden HX/Z a year before. Cost $6,189

    Interest rates -capped at 11% for me - reached 15%+ during the loan which we'd paid off about 1995, when petrol was about 70 cents/litre (When my Classic was priced at $95k....)

    In 2000 we lashed out $78,000 to extend and double the living space, and now it's a 4x2. I was on $55k.

    Today, the median price for same/smaller houses in this area, 30 mins from the Perth CBD, is $370,000 and petrol is $1.47/litre.
    Now I'm eating into my dwindling savings, driving busses and sweepers..and wondering how my sons will ever afford an old house, never mind a new one!

    But lots of 'refugees' from the world's trouble - spots seem to be driving around my area in, 'not cheap & cheerful' cars. Dunno how they do it...

  9. #139
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    2,225
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    too many "investment" properties.

    need to do what singapore has done.

    first house, no stamp duty
    second house (aka investment property), 50% stamp duty

    basically makes it very easy to get a house (as it should be)
    makes it very expensive to buy a second house..
    I like the concept - how do they prevent a couple from not owning two properties, one in each name (or more properties held under corporate structures, or in kids names)? I imagine that would fly like a lead balloon with the voting public.

    Should at least phase out negative gearing over 5 or so years before taking more drastic steps. All it does is push house prices out of reach of those who can least afford them. The bill to the taxpayer? Around $13 billion for the last financial year! Hawke & Keating tried in 1985 but had to reinstate following the '87 stock crash.

  10. #140
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Offender90 View Post
    I like the concept - how do they prevent a couple from not owning two properties, one in each name (or more properties held under corporate structures, or in kids names)? I imagine that would fly like a lead balloon with the voting public.

    Should at least phase out negative gearing over 5 or so years before taking more drastic steps. All it does is push house prices out of reach of those who can least afford them. The bill to the taxpayer? Around $13 billion for the last financial year! Hawke & Keating tried in 1985 but had to reinstate following the '87 stock crash.
    I'm not sure how its done to that level of detail.

    Negative gearing should be removed. It encourages bad investment.
    Equity is a scam too.

Page 14 of 17 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!