My understanding is the number quoted is the percentage of "boat people" determined to be genuine refugees by the Refugee Tribunal.
He was saying that historically 94% of boat of so called "boat people"
coming to Australia are genuine refugees fleeing persecution
My understanding is that The Department of Immigration assessment procedure has found that approximately 40% of arrivals are genuine refugees.
One of the big problems we face is that there is no way of checking identities and Bona Fides and that the Refugee Tribubal which is funded by taxpayers and the lawyers who represent the applicants ( funded by taxpayers) seem very liable to give "benefit of the doubt" to applicants.
Hence we have had farces like the Captain Amad case and his daughter.
I have a big problem with the disparity in the classification.
Here we have experts in Immigration with one determination ( 40%)and a tribunal made up of worthy citizens with another (95%).
One has to be very wrong and IMHO it is the tribunal in the majority of cases.
Regards Philip A
Last edited by TheTree; 25th November 2013 at 08:32 AM. Reason: spelling
DO NOT label people racists and bigots for simply having an opinion. That is what you did and in the vast majority of cases you are wrong and just showing your ignorance. That sort of behavior is what makes sensible conversation about a topic like this almost impossible.
Does tossing those labels around amongst your fellow countrymen who are showing concern for the future of their country make you unpatriotic? I'll leave you to consider that one.
Great to hear you are donating your time. Have you thought about opening your house to a refugee family? Maybe you already have? That would be one less family that won't be shipped somewhere that doesn't meet with your approval. Perhaps you can let us know how you get on with that? Leading by example is a powerful thing.
I don't see many people simply dismissing boat people in this thread as if they don't matter or are of little consequence. There are plenty of opinions on what does and doesn't work and what is and isn't good for our country, but most are reasonable and don't require an emotive reaction like yours.
Have a think about this country, what it has to offer and how many we can offer it to before we start to go backwards at a rate of knots. It might be a big island, but the vast majority of it is uninhabitable. We are in the process of moving from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, so we (just in the next few years) will see (as one example) Holden and Toyota ceasing manufacturing. This will happen. That's 30,000+ jobs lost.
You got a plan for those 30,000 families and how they'll survive, or are they just racists and bigots and not worthy of your care and attention? They'll be lost at sea in their own way in the next few years.
There is so much more to this than you have obviously ever considered, and considering it is what every real Australian that cares anything about their country should be doing. Both sides of the argument need diligent consideration not just the side that eases your mind and soothes your heart right now.
"What a bizarre statement, unless you are an Aboriginal we are all migrants !"
Now this is a crock.
Interesting Statement, I would beg to differ, any time there is a disaster be it local or abroad Australians open their hearts and their wallets every time, be it Sunami, cyclone, earthquake or bushfires, so to make that comment is just plan wrong.
From the posts I have read, most people just want to know that the people who are coming here are doing so for the correct reason, and not to exploit our people or our country.
Here I was thinking the "Stop the Boats" idea was to stop the loss of lives at sea...how nieve of me..
Just because we dont have an open door policy doesnt make us heartless and uncaring race of people.
Cheers Ean
Mr steane, I have studied your post to find errors in it. I think I have found a couple.
First, you tout 30,000 jobs lost in the automotive manufacturing industry. I think you failed to take into account the industries that supply/support those indistries. The pundits are touting figures over 100,000.
Second, you state we are in the process of moving from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, Yes, manufacturing is almost all gone but, is banking a service industry, most of their back room operations have gone overseas. The support for your telco's have gone to call centres overseas. Two friends who worked for Telstra were made redundant a month or so ago as their positions were moved offshore. In my industry, an industry that services amongst other things maufacturing, increasing ammounts of the work is being moved offshore to Thailand, Mexico and Germany.
If by service industry, you mean shops supplying the worker with cafe latte's, With the increasing percentage of unemployed and due to the downward pressure on wages, the increasing percentage of working poor, you'll find less and less people (who are trying to contend with spiralling upward energy, telephone and council charges) will be unable to afford a five dollar latte and even those cafe's will gradually go out of business.
I fear we are in for some rocky times ahead.
I wonder if Germany, Japan or America will accept me as a reugee?
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks