Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 100 of 100

Thread: Favourite Aussie-made vehicle?

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,868
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post

    I can't say the Citroen DSpeciale, as it was imported after Australian assembly stopped.

    John
    Easy ... Make it a Citroen ID19 ... I'm driving one of my '63 Aussie assembled ID19's around today...

    seeya,
    Shane L.

  2. #92
    2stroke Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by d2dave View Post
    And a fibre cam gear which was known to fail.
    I fitted an ally gear to the 173 in the Torana, must have been 20 years ago.
    Funny though that all you needed to do to a Holden was fit a Holley carby and you'd break axles like dry wood, yet the boys in the ricers seem to be able to treble their horsepower and still have no driveline dramas.

  3. #93
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleHo View Post
    4 cyl Lycoming ? or the 6 ?
    I don't know if that makes a difference to my overall opinion of this an a top Australian-made vehicle since the motor is not Australian, but I would have to lean towards the turbo-charged 6. Better performance across the board... except for endurance.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Mount Gambier, Blue Lake City
    Posts
    246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Avion8 View Post
    Not my favorite but 99% of Australians loved it, yes the Lightburn Zeta, came across one yesterday, and with the drivers seat removed I could probably drive it from the back seat!!



    Just lightyears ahead of it's time
    Australia's answer to the East German Trabant!

  5. #95
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,528
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleChevron View Post
    Easy ... Make it a Citroen ID19 ... I'm driving one of my '63 Aussie assembled ID19's around today...

    seeya,
    Shane L.
    Worth thinking about! In 1960 the ID19 was Australian assembled. Consider a few comparisons with the then most popular car in Australia, the Holden FB:-

    Engines - ID19, hemihead pushrod four, wet sleeve, development of 1934 engine, 69BHP
    Holden, pushrod six, 75BHP, development of 1920s engine. Neither engine had a full flow oil filter.
    Transmission - ID 19, four speed, synchro on all gears, overdrive top, FWD. Holden, three speed, synchro on top two, RWD, both column shift.
    Brakes - ID19, 11" inboard front discs, drum rear, full power (not power assist) dual braking system, adjusted between front and rear according to load. Holden, unassisted 8" narrow drums all round, single circuit.
    Suspension - ID19, four wheel independent, self levelling oleopneumatic, adjustable height, equal wishbones on roller bearings front, trailing arm on roller bearings rear, sway bars front and rear. Holden, unequal wishbones, coils front, leaf springs rear, no sway bars.
    Steering - ID19, rack and pinion, power optional, collapsible steering column. Holden, cam and roller, no collapsible column.
    Tyres - ID19, radial 165x400. Holden, crossply 6.40x13.
    Body - ID19, controlled collapse rate front structure, fuel tank enclosed within crossmember and completely protected; drag coefficient similar to the best cars today, smooth underbody. Holden, conventional, styling ignored drag.
    Standard accessories - ID19, heater, windscreen washers. Holden, 0
    Both cars were unbelievably spartan by modern standards! But the only changes required to the ID19 to meet safety standards into the late seventies were antiburst door locks and seat belts - the Holden needed a complete redesign.

    Mind you, the ID19 was about 30% more expensive than the Holden, but it was much roomier, towed better, and had a bigger boot. But it looked different, and most mechanics were frightened of them. Fuel consumption was about the same, but the ID19 had a much bigger fuel tank.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bangor, NSW
    Posts
    1,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    10 pages and nobody has mentioned Elfin. There, I just did!

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jonesy63 View Post
    10 pages and nobody has mentioned Elfin. There, I just did!
    Mmmmm.....
    Like the Mallala.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tyrendarra Vic (South West Vic )
    Posts
    1,729
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ilinga or any Bolwell

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    501
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Favourite Aussie vehicle

    What about my ford/Marmon Herrington 1941 gun tractor. Constant 4 wheel drive
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,868
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Worth thinking about! In 1960 the ID19 was Australian assembled. Consider a few comparisons with the then most popular car in Australia, the Holden FB:-

    Engines - ID19, hemihead pushrod four, wet sleeve, development of 1934 engine, 69BHP
    Holden, pushrod six, 75BHP, development of 1920s engine. Neither engine had a full flow oil filter.
    Transmission - ID 19, four speed, synchro on all gears, overdrive top, FWD. Holden, three speed, synchro on top two, RWD, both column shift.
    Brakes - ID19, 11" inboard front discs, drum rear, full power (not power assist) dual braking system, adjusted between front and rear according to load. Holden, unassisted 8" narrow drums all round, single circuit.
    Suspension - ID19, four wheel independent, self levelling oleopneumatic, adjustable height, equal wishbones on roller bearings front, trailing arm on roller bearings rear, sway bars front and rear. Holden, unequal wishbones, coils front, leaf springs rear, no sway bars.
    Steering - ID19, rack and pinion, power optional, collapsible steering column. Holden, cam and roller, no collapsible column.
    Tyres - ID19, radial 165x400. Holden, crossply 6.40x13.
    Body - ID19, controlled collapse rate front structure, fuel tank enclosed within crossmember and completely protected; drag coefficient similar to the best cars today, smooth underbody. Holden, conventional, styling ignored drag.
    Standard accessories - ID19, heater, windscreen washers. Holden, 0
    Both cars were unbelievably spartan by modern standards! But the only changes required to the ID19 to meet safety standards into the late seventies were antiburst door locks and seat belts - the Holden needed a complete redesign.

    Mind you, the ID19 was about 30% more expensive than the Holden, but it was much roomier, towed better, and had a bigger boot. But it looked different, and most mechanics were frightened of them. Fuel consumption was about the same, but the ID19 had a much bigger fuel tank.

    John
    The locally assembled cars were even more spartan than that.





    These are my two drivers here (well there on club permits either way). The early ones had no power brakes, still massive inboard disks, but a big HEAVY standard brake pedal. None of the locally sold cars had power steering.



    I don't know about the steering column colapsing, but the steering wheel itself is designed to do that.

    This is how sparse they are, most had no boot light, no "door pins" for the interior light (you have to find the dash switch in the dark), no heater fan (it's air guided up by the engine driven radiator fan for the demister), rubber floor mats, no power steering, "pump" action windscreen washer (about as useful as tits on a bull), no synchro on first gear (early ones), no brake assisntance (early ones), no reversing lights, no radio, no gauges, no "warning" of any sort of overheating, oil pressure etc, the only warning light (not gauge) is the hydraulic pressure .... which would be kinda obvious when your crashing along the ground with no supsension and no brakes either way. They will cruise at an indicated 90mph from the weeny little 3bearing 1911cc 4cylinder engine though.

    The later cars had door pins for the interior lights, a boot light, my '63 aussie made seatbelts made in '62 .... maybe they were a dealer fitted option (front and rear), full power "button" brakes....

    The locally made vinyl trim is remarkable though. That still the original 51 year old seats in that picture above. The ( locally sourced ?) rubbers are garbage though, every body rubber on the car is like glass. When you slam the doors you can hear the window seals shatter some more.

    seeya,
    Shane L.

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!