
Originally Posted by
JDNSW
Worth thinking about! In 1960 the ID19 was Australian assembled. Consider a few comparisons with the then most popular car in Australia, the Holden FB:-
Engines - ID19, hemihead pushrod four, wet sleeve, development of 1934 engine, 69BHP
Holden, pushrod six, 75BHP, development of 1920s engine. Neither engine had a full flow oil filter.
Transmission - ID 19, four speed, synchro on all gears, overdrive top, FWD. Holden, three speed, synchro on top two, RWD, both column shift.
Brakes - ID19, 11" inboard front discs, drum rear, full power (not power assist) dual braking system, adjusted between front and rear according to load. Holden, unassisted 8" narrow drums all round, single circuit.
Suspension - ID19, four wheel independent, self levelling oleopneumatic, adjustable height, equal wishbones on roller bearings front, trailing arm on roller bearings rear, sway bars front and rear. Holden, unequal wishbones, coils front, leaf springs rear, no sway bars.
Steering - ID19, rack and pinion, power optional, collapsible steering column. Holden, cam and roller, no collapsible column.
Tyres - ID19, radial 165x400. Holden, crossply 6.40x13.
Body - ID19, controlled collapse rate front structure, fuel tank enclosed within crossmember and completely protected; drag coefficient similar to the best cars today, smooth underbody. Holden, conventional, styling ignored drag.
Standard accessories - ID19, heater, windscreen washers. Holden, 0
Both cars were unbelievably spartan by modern standards! But the only changes required to the ID19 to meet safety standards into the late seventies were antiburst door locks and seat belts - the Holden needed a complete redesign.
Mind you, the ID19 was about 30% more expensive than the Holden, but it was much roomier, towed better, and had a bigger boot. But it looked different, and most mechanics were frightened of them. Fuel consumption was about the same, but the ID19 had a much bigger fuel tank.
John
Bookmarks