Hopefully made the learner driver more aware of how stupid other road users can be !
As a bike rider or Disco driver I did laugh at that gent head down head long into the parked car
While being to PC is pita - Shooting people didn't tickle my funny bone. With too many near misses from car drivers while on my bike or on pedestrian crossings with my kids or similar I fully agree with the need for respect as well as a sense of humour.
I think an accident is a asteroid falling on my head not a person reversing over a foot path or not following road rules and attempting to murder me or you in complete ignorance or stupidity. The bike rider above showed complete ignorance or stupidity, luckily he could have only hurt himself- I hope and assume he didn't as it was fairly slow. When a driver does the same to a bike rider even at that speed it clearly would not be funny. I appreciate my sense of humour may therefore be a little hypocritical. With 20 odd dead , paraplegic or quadriplegic mates from motor bikes or bikes, my sense of humour is a little thin sorry. We all make "mistakes"- just some of us do not recover or the victim of our "mistakes" may not. Sincerely hope this is never applicable to you of course.
Hopefully made the learner driver more aware of how stupid other road users can be !
This is the way this thread goes...
![]()
Yes, its about as hilarious as persecuting an asylum seeker who just wanted his little daughter to be happy untill he gives up and attempts suicide, so you drag him off to hospital while leaving his little girl abandoned for two days, and then you drag the father off to a Nauru court and get him fined for attempting suicide because of your persecution. Hilarious. Don't believe me - it actually happened this week in one of our hellhole detention centres. What a laugh hey? Hilarious.
Sometimes I despair for this country.
Actually this is more like an asylum seeker being accepted to Australia from Syria or turkey or Iraq or Lebanon etc and offered a plane ticket to Oz but instead choosing to fly to Indonesia and hop on a leaky boat.
It's about mutual respect, if your LR lost high range 10km from home and you only had 1st and 2nd low , most of us would plod along but pull over into the breakdown lanes/ road shoulder to let traffic past. Now imagine if there was no vehicular traffic in your direction , but , there was a mass of cyclists on a single lane road stuck behind you, with heavy traffic heading in the opposite direction? Their all wanting to go 30-60kph and your stuck doing 10-15. Now for most of that road there is a rough break shoulder wide enough for you to use , similar to numerous cycle ways next to lots of roads, but because you have a right to be on the road refuse to use it. The cyclists can't because the shards and gouges would flatten their tyres or throw them off the bike.
The result of this is the cyclists spend 20 min doing a 5-7min section, several fall off as their feet are locked in and the wave effect means from the middle back they end up stopping suddenly for no apparent reason, whilst others get flat spots in their tyres jamming on the brakes, or making close encounters with the scenery when their brakes fail.
P.s I thought the John Wayne clip was excellent .![]()
By all means get a Defender. If you get a good one, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
apologies to Socrates
Clancy MY15 110 Defender
Clancy's gone to Queensland Rovering, and we don't know where he are
The John Wayne funny clip was a perfect example of not following road rules as a majority of his second "shots" where cyclists tailgating!
And there's the crux of the argument!
It's an offence for you to do 1/3 the speed of the surrounding road users IF your a registered road user , but perfectly fine if your unregistered on a push bike going uphill.
Now here's one for the backyard legalistas' , would it be an offence to be going to slowly in front of a group of cyclists who had no opportunity to pass safety? As your not actually blocking any registered vehicles how could it be?![]()
Where is that ofence defined?
Yes
Road rule 125
Unreasonably obstructing drivers or pedestrians
(1) A driver must not unreasonably obstruct the path of another
driver or a pedestrian.
Offence provision.
Note Driver includes a person in control of a vehicle ? see the
definition of drive in the dictionary.
(2) For this rule, a driver does not unreasonably obstruct the
path of another driver or a pedestrian only because:
(a) the driver is stopped in traffic; or
(b) the driver is driving more slowly than other vehicles
(unless the driver is driving abnormally slowly in the
circumstances).
Example of a driver driving abnormally slowly
A driver driving at a speed of 20 kilometres per hour on a length of road
to which a speed-limit of 80 kilometres per hour applies when there is
no reason for the driver to drive at that speed on the length of road.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | 
    Search All the Web! | 
  
|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
Bookmarks