Back in the 1960s, I think it was possible to lose your car licence and then get yourself a motorcycle licence. I doubt that would still be allowed.
My mate lost his car licence and for a short time tried using a push bike, but a couple of issues persuaded him to get a motorcycle licence instead.
The first problem was that he lived near the top of the south hill in Armidale and he found he was forever having to walk down the hill to retrieve his bike.  It seems his friends were quite happy to "borrow" his bike to ride down to the main street, but were reluctant to ride the bike back up the hill.
The second problem was that he was given a severe talking to by the local police for "riding his bike furiously".  He was riding home from church at the time. 
As this incident occurred about half a century ago, I thought my recollection of the offence might have been faulty, so I had a look at the following site.
Driving Furiously and other Less Prosecuted Offences
It seems that it is indeed an offence to drive furiously, ride a pushbike furiously and in England it is even an offence to ride a horse furiously if you injure someone.
Even more bizarrely, this year in England, a pensioner has actually been found guilty of a 167 year old offence and one rarely prosecuted these days.
She was riding through the Surry countryside, ?furiously?, and it was reported to police by witnesses who were incensed at her refusal to slow down as she neared others and the fact that she was yelling at her horse. The 65 year old pleaded guilty to the charges and got a fine.
The relevant section of the Road Transport Act is here.
ROAD TRANSPORT ACT 2013 - SECT 117 Negligent, furious or reckless driving
So all you cyclists who ride "furiously", you have been warned. 



 
			
		
Bookmarks