Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 137

Thread: Nanny State Again

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    That is the case with everything. A primary producer or hunter can slaughter and butcher animals for their own personal consumption, and even give the meat away, but food regulations prohibit it from being sold because it has not been slaughtered in a licensed slaughterhouse.

    Just as a farmer can give their workers or friends raw milk...
    Well. I have just changed my product. I am now selling plastic containers. Rather expensive plastic containers. It just so happens these containers may or may not contain raw milk. Now the nanny state will have to introduce another piece of legislation to cover that example. And on it goes.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mick, remember when the eggboard took one producer to court because he was selling cheap eggs on the farm gates?
    I do not not if it is a nanny state but it is over regulated for sure.

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    Well. I have just changed my product. I am now selling plastic containers. Rather expensive plastic containers. It just so happens these containers may or may not contain raw milk. Now the nanny state will have to introduce another piece of legislation to cover that example. And on it goes.
    You are right Mick, all these laws are silly and we should remove them, while we are at it we can remove all the other silly laws like:

    Wearing seatbelts
    Not letting kids ride in the back of utes
    Helmet laws (all of them)
    Smoking and passive smoking laws
    Disinfection of drinking water and all other beverages and foodstuffs
    Driving under the influence laws
    etc...

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    You are right Mick, all these laws are silly and we should remove them, while we are at it we can remove all the other silly laws like:

    Wearing seatbelts
    Not letting kids ride in the back of utes
    Helmet laws (all of them)
    Smoking and passive smoking laws
    Disinfection of drinking water and all other beverages and foodstuffs
    Driving under the influence laws
    etc...
    Ben!! that is not fair, I would like to grow the funny weeds in my back yard and not be forced to send my kids to primary school

    Now, seriously, we have to agree that we have some over the top regulations like the one about not be able to have more than 6 chooks in the back yard and give the eggs away.
    There are others that we must have for the protection of the rest of the population. Vaccination come to my mind but then again that it is on another thread

  5. #115
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    You are right Mick, all these laws are silly and we should remove them, while we are at it we can remove all the other silly laws like:

    Wearing seatbelts
    Not letting kids ride in the back of utes
    Helmet laws (all of them)
    Smoking and passive smoking laws
    Disinfection of drinking water and all other beverages and foodstuffs
    Driving under the influence laws
    etc...
    Now I know you are being facetious.
    It's interesting, though, we''d probably save more lives if we banned the sale of raw chicken meat. My mother has been carted off to hospital on at least three different occasions, nearly died on one of those occasions, because of consumption of shellfish. Perhaps we should ban those. I'm tipping more people die from the consumption of shellfish than from the consumption of raw milk.

    Anyways, we are side tracking more and more from my main point. We do not need another superfluous law when justice can be seen to be done under existing laws. We do not need the nanny state to be over regulating us to death.

  6. #116
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Seymour, Victoria.
    Posts
    751
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post

    Wearing seatbelts
    Not letting kids ride in the back of utes
    Helmet laws (all of them)
    Smoking and passive smoking laws
    Disinfection of drinking water and all other beverages and foodstuffs
    Driving under the influence laws
    etc...
    These laws only exist because we have free healthcare. The only one that is of contention is smoking because it raises more revenue than it costs to treat.
    While the government supplies free healthcare it has the right to mitigate the risk. It does this by passing safety related legislation.
    Water, and foodstuffs are an international standard we agree to follow.

    Why do you think you don't have to wear a helmet in the states (well some states)? because the government isn't paying for your stupidity.

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    My mother has been carted off to hospital on at least three different occasions, nearly died on one of those occasions,
    maybe she should learn to cook

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    maybe she should learn to cook
    That's what I thought when I read it - at her age she should know not to eat raw chicken.

    Explains a lot about Mick

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's interesting, though, we''d probably save more lives if we banned the sale of raw chicken meat. My mother has been carted off to hospital on at least three different occasions, nearly died on one of those occasions, because of consumption of shellfish.
    Mick, there are VERY stringent laws on preparing oysters for sale.

    In NSW all Oysters have to be depurated ( starved and held in known pure water) for 3 days before being sold or shucked.

    Every estuary has to have a Management plan which states action to be taken after rain events. Typically there has to be a moratorium on harvest for up to 10 days plus depuration.

    When the system breaks down as it did in Wallace Lake many years ago the results are dire. And the oyster growers were depurating but the water had e coli in it.

    So I guess Nanny State again.

    Regards Philip A

  10. #120
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    maybe she should learn to cook
    Perhaps it have nothing to do with cooking and it is in the way that the raw chicken is been handled.
    How many people wash/rinse the chicken pieces before preparing them for cooking?
    Many? well they are wrong, that is one of the best way to spread the bacteria on other utensils, kitchen bench, cutlery or even in your hands.
    The best way to kill the bacteria is by cooking the chicken without washing it first.

    Some other good hints are HERE

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!