I absolutely agree there is no need for physical discipline whatsoever. When I say discipline I mean that understanding that your actions have consequences whether that is no fishing for weekend or whatever for kicking your sister in the shins.
So apologies to anyone who thinks I am endorsing physical discipline, quite the opposite. It's hard to get tone and context across in text.
A good friend of mine teaches full time in south bris and he said that when you say you'll contact the kids parents they will say call them I don't care, he said if he says that to any of the islander kids you could hear a pin drop for the rest of the class.
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
Fair enough guys, probably should have been a little more refined given the context .
I do not agree and have never agreed with physical discipline on people and especially not animals.
I am merely trying to state that most of the time when it comes to this topic you always get a hyperpolerisation in either direction and war ensues every time with both sides having partial truths. Disciple and lack of discipline can be both pathological
Cheers
Often the polarisation of views occurs because of the common assumption that discipline necessarily means corporal punishment.
While I am not advocating corporal punishment, it should be noted that there are forms of discipline that could have a more detrimental effect than a light smack across the wrist.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
We smacked our kids just on the hand if they did something they shouldn't have. How do you tell a 2 year old not to touch a stove or coffee cup etc they do not understand why. But when you smacked them then they know. We only had to smacked them a couple of times when they where growing up and they got the message. When they went out to Nana's place or friends they never touched anything or climb on lounges etc because they knew how to behave. Never had them throw a fit in the shops as you see today. Because kids are never discipline when they are small. Kids know these days that they can not get smacked and throw it up in parents faces that they can not be touched. I do not believe they should be hit on the head as I have seen some parent do some years back, only on the hand or on the back of the leg. I was smacked when I was a child it did not do any harm to me.Heather
Yep, the PI families I know are very strong loving groups. In many cases the thing the PI kids fear most is bringing shame on their family and facing potential ostracism because their behaviour is unacceptable to the others.
Unfortunately, some other kids don't seem to care if they make their families ashamed of them.
I don't see any benefit in physical punishment. The aim is to change their attitudes, not hurt them.
Little kids who go to hit someone should be grabbed on the arm they are swinging, spoken to very firmly about why they can't hit people, made to apologise and then taught the correct way to get attention.
Boundaries of behaviour have to be set. Parents who ignore their kids bad behaviour are actually teaching them that any behaviour is acceptable. That is likely to get the kids into big trouble in the future. Their kids won't thank them later for having indulged them.
Set boundaries, explain why the boundaries apply, and stick rigidly to them. That's the way forwards. Even if the kids rebel, they will still know what is acceptable and unacceptable.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks