My journey is about to begin.....my daughter sits her knowledge test for her L's on Saturday week.
Cheers,
Sean
“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein
You got that right. Below are the study books my son had to learn to get his commercial license.
For those that don't know, the commercial is not a license to fly big jets, this is simply to allow him to earn money flying
and in this case just in a small single engine plane.
And the book for learning to drive.

Dave.
I was asked " Is it ignorance or apathy?" I replied "I don't know and I don't care."
1983 RR gone (wish I kept it)
1996 TDI ES.
2003 TD5 HSE
1987 Isuzu County
 ChatterBox
					
					
						ChatterBox
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 
 
		After what I saw on the roads lately , it seems no one is teaching these new invincibles about reading the the traffic or courtesy towards other road users , including pedestrians on crossings. If it weren't for the costs involved I would like to see a national licence and scheduled reassessments every couple of years. Often I have heard most drivers would fail the German testing.
I think the problem you are seeing is not knowledge in most cases, but attitude. They know the rules, and know what they should do - they just find it more convenient to forget this after they have passed the test. In light of this, I doubt that regular testing would have a significant effect - and as you comment, it would be very expensive. A bit like routine annual roadworthy tests as used by some states but not others - nothing in the statistics suggests it has a detectable effect on road safety.
As for "national" - first you would have to arrange for the states to all agree to harmonise the laws and regulations. That simply is not going to happen. Just to take a simple example - a state with a minimum licencing age of 17 is never going to agree to go to 18 just to conform; too many young people (looking forward to their licence at 17) vote next year, and a state with a licencing age of 18 is never going to agree to drop it to 17; too many voters had to wait until they were 18.
The same sort of thing applies to nearly all the other difference - "they should change, not us". As they say, "Politics is the art of the possible", and this is just not possible.
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
I'll go on that list too and you can bung rego in for good measure. ACTUALLY: Why not mace all Road and Traffic Legislation and administration NATIONAL?
Cheers, Billy.
Keeping it simple is complicated.
Because Australia is a federation - and to change this would require a majority in all states at a referendum. Trying to get that passed would be a pretty futile exercise. (Instead of changing the constitution you could get all states and territories to agree to transfer all this to the Commonwealth - only a slightly less futile endeavour!)
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Maybe, but I have seen no "strong public voice" for the abolition of states.
The problem is that people may feel strongly, for example, about uniform national road laws and regulations, but there is no support (or very little) to even discuss the political changes that are necessary for these to happen.
The other issue is that although many people want uniform regulations, what they expect is every other state and territory coming into line with us!
When it comes to us making changes to come into line with the rest, especially when it comes to serious issues such as driving age - forget it!
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks