As mentioned above aerodynamics play a part in it all. Now matter how good the engine is its still shaped like a house brick. Matt
I think they may of rounded it off the last one was further on in the sales list 8O
Thats my theory anyway :roll:
Baz.
Cheers Baz.
2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
2007 BMW R1200GS
1979 BMW R80/7
1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow
As mentioned above aerodynamics play a part in it all. Now matter how good the engine is its still shaped like a house brick. Matt
The 4wd Zone/Opposite Lock Bathurst
263 Stewart Street, Bathurst, NSW
http://www.the4wdzone.com.au/
Discounts for AULRO members, just shoot me a PM before you purchase.
so defenders are the ordinary house hold brick and discoveries are besser bricks?
Dont think for a second i am bagging defenders i love them, but the shape does hinder ther forward momentum somewhat. That cant be denied. How much worse it is than the disco i couldnt tell. Has anyone got a wind tunnel we can borrow.Originally posted by mickrangie
so defenders are the ordinary house hold brick and discoveries are besser bricks?![]()
The 4wd Zone/Opposite Lock Bathurst
263 Stewart Street, Bathurst, NSW
http://www.the4wdzone.com.au/
Discounts for AULRO members, just shoot me a PM before you purchase.
Nah!
Defenders a aerated brick![]()
And yeah, I love mine too...
Cheers
Mike
Just reviving this old post with a quick follow up. I've taken off the canopy from the back of my 130, and now I can go up all the way up the freeway in 5th gear, so looks like it is predominantly a weight issue more than aerodynamics.
It is an all aluminium canopy, and before I took it off I estimated it to weight 200-250Kg. Wrong! It nearly tipped my tractor over lifting it off (I didn't bother put on the counterweight), and when I rang the fabricating company who made it I found it was 600Kg. I was miles out.
So, drop 600Kg off your car and the performance increases a huge amount. No wonder auto makers all want to make parts lighter.
Cheers
David
but the manufacturers keep making the whole car heavier with each successive modelNo wonder auto makers all want to make parts lighter.
And FWIW, the high range is different 'tween a 'fender and Disco, with the Defender using a 1.410:1 high range, and, IIRC a Disco around 1.22:1, so the overal final drive ratio is slightly lower in a 'fender, but actual gearing possibly works out the same when tyre diamater is taken into account.
I would imaging your economy has improved some what aswell. mattOriginally Posted by spudboy
The 4wd Zone/Opposite Lock Bathurst
263 Stewart Street, Bathurst, NSW
http://www.the4wdzone.com.au/
Discounts for AULRO members, just shoot me a PM before you purchase.
I can't be bothered reading through all the replies but apologies if it has already been said....Originally Posted by spudboy
1 - IIRC, the 130 is heavier than the Disco.
2 - The Defender has the aerodynamics of a brick.
3 - The transfer boxes have different ratios between the Disco & Defender.
4 - Tyre sizes. The 130 runs on larger tyres (which are harder to turn).... This makes a BIG difference.
If you want to try a little test... Stick some smaller tyres on the 130 & give it another go.![]()
M
I'm somewhat astounded that it is that heavy, but as well as the weight , the aerodynamics would have been affected as well (just how much depends on the canopy) - and this may have been a larger effect than the weight.Originally Posted by spudboy
My County will tow my big trailer comfortably at 100km/h (provided it is level)- but only if I take the rear tailgate off the trailer! This tailgate is about a foot high and 2m long.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks