Governments, bureaucrats and news publishers have memories of convenience for various reasons.
Facts can be reported with a spin that that barely resembles actuality. Brisbane has always been prone to catastrophic flooding, with major events in 1841/90/93, 1931/74 and 2011. I was in Brisbane for the latter two. 1974 was a bigger flood than 2011yet the media had to beat up the latest event in their sensationalist manner, in order to attract the gullible, ergo sell more advertising space.The media reports were not wrong, but they were far from the truth.
FACT. The water was deeper in the Brisbane River and low lying suburbs in 1974.
REPORTED. 2011 floods are worst on record. Places flooded that were not flooded in '74. More buildings flood effected than in 1974.
ACTUALLY. Land previously designated floodprone had been approved for development. Floodplains built up, covered with houses, concrete and bitumen causing houses that didn't flood in '74 to go under in '11.
It was only a worse flood for people who were inundated in 2011, but not in '74.
Are the gullible going to blame climate change for Brisbane flooding? Bear in mind until the early 1660s, when the Dutch and Spanish had a quick squiz from the water, white folk hadn't seen the east coast. Then Jimmy breezed up the coast in 1770, camping at Cooktown for a month or two, but he seemed to be preoccupied with boat building so didn't get much chance to do any significant climate change stuff. Flinders (take note Pedro) had a bit of a scout around, a couple of times around the turn of the century but didn't leave a footprint. Just before midway through the 1800s, Oxley, Petie and Lockyer paved the way for settlement. Admittedly, it's in the timeframe of the first recorded flood but I don't think Europeans had time to cause it. Maybe there were previous floods that the Aborigines didn't notice, or were too inconsiderate to record and measure.
Without trivialising the heartbreak and trauma of the current bushfires, they are regular, natural events. They are the worst for the poor souls who are directly affected, the press who sensationalise for revenue and the gullible.
In 1967 the nation was stopped by a newsflash, The Prime Minister has disappeared off Cheviot Beach. A significant event, worthy of the description breaking news. These days, the Prime Minister's chauffeur getting a parking ticket would be considered breaking news. Hardly a week goes by without a newsflash, breaking or unfolding story about some relatively minor issue.
There endeth the history lesson.

Bookmarks