
 Originally Posted by 
bob10
					 
				 
				
			
		 
	 
 You didn't need to measure the air temp above Antarctica to realise that this year was going to be dry .. a quick read over the historical data would have indicated that one of the last two or next two would be so.
So the prediction isn't so much spot on .. as it's 'inevitable'.
So what do these geniuses predict for 2020 then .. already proven to have been so 'spot on'.
Oh! and as for this quote:
	
		
			
			
				Climate change doesn’t create bushfires, but can make them worse
			
		 
	 
 From this link to the same news source(different article).
Exactly, what do they mean? The implication is that a warming globe is causing worse bushfires .. that's what I'm reading .. or is there a hidden implication in their article.
Are they sayingn that it has made them worse in some way. What exactly does the term 'can' mean. Where is the proof that is has in some way made them worse even to use the fence sitting term 'can'. 
It either will or it won't. 
If there is a variability to the worsening level of bushfire destructivity, it's either caused by one phenomenon or another! which is it?
All they're trying to achieve here is the typical emotional, non cynical response from the reader who is easily duped by hyperbole. Most will read it and think .. "damn this global warming is causing worse bushfires" and be done with it.
But the reality is global warming has reduced bushfire damage to land(simplistic I know, as this doesn't take into account human activity on the land since then).
So, again, the issue here is that there is zero data to prove their statement, and in fact the data points to an opposing statement.. that climate change(that is man made climate change .. warming!) has made bushfires much less worse in their destructive ability.
Bushfires in Victoria 
Where are they seeing this supposed worsening bushfires data?
Australia sees some of the worst bushfires in the world. period!
The list of the worst bushfires in the world predominantly see the very late 1800's and early 1900's as the worst period. 
It's all in the definition, or the adjective used by them calling it worse/worsening.
What they're referring too is the loss of life and property, but in terms of totality of destroyed land .. nothing compares with the 1850's Black Thursday in Vic .. basically 5x worse than any other. 
NSW sees some monstrous fires too .. notably pre 1984. 
Also noting tho that the 1980's is generall regarded as the beginning of the warming period(compared to the 1900 baseline temperature anomaly).
So, while there have been some massive fires since the beginning of the warming period, none match the affected area that the earliest fires had done!
So what the headline should have read is something such as:
Human encroachment into the bush is causing modern bushfires to produce higher human casualties for a given fire period! 
That would make this specific news service less deceptive, less sensationalist, and far more accurate. 
Doing so tho would be counterproductive to their sales base I guess. People won't care as climate change isn't being blamed, and some may even out them as climate sceptics for the fact that they hadn't blamed climate change. 
If these are a primary source you use for news, without question ... all the best to 'ya!
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				Arthur.
All these discos are giving me a heart attack!
'99 D1 300Tdi Auto ( now sold :( )
'03 D2 Td5 Auto
'03 D2a Td5 Auto
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks