Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 199

Thread: Petrol VS diesel?

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I take it that ALL of the detractors of the tojo 4.5 V8 actually personally
    own one or have owned one to be able to "Qualify" their comments
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trout1105 View Post
    I take it that ALL of the detractors of the tojo 4.5 V8 actually personally
    own one or have owned one to be able to "Qualify" their comments
    I can qualify my comments firstly on the basis of published power and torque figures and the fact that my brother purchased a new single cab GXL in 2010 and we have been away a bit together - for sure not my vehicle but a vehicle i know pretty well. Compared to my RRS always used more fuel in the same circumstances, my bro was unimpresssed with power and torque so had it chipped and a larger exhaust put on it - still unhappy at its lack of power (for the engine size) - (and this is the basis of most complaints - power and torque is poor for a 4.5 litre engine).

    He had enough after 3 years and went to a 200 series TDV8 - same 4.5litres but mores reasonable power and torque for the engine size but still only around the same a a 3.0 SDV6.

    The single turbo 4.5 TDV8 only has around the same power and torque as a 2.7 TDv6 - says a lot and the TDV6 is not an overstressed engine - yes it has issues but so does the TDV8.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All I know is that I have been zipping along today on the M1 and 100 to 110kph and averaging in the high 6's l/100k in the Triton. 1650rpm at 100kph in 6th and quiet. I'm liking that. Engine hasn't freed up either yet. Only has 800ks on it. Cheers

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    All I know is that I have been zipping along today on the M1 and 100 to 110kph and averaging in the high 6's l/100k in the Triton. 1650rpm at 100kph in 6th and quiet. I'm liking that. Engine hasn't freed up either yet. Only has 800ks on it. Cheers
    My daughter bought a new Triton twincab a few months ago and she also says it runs on the smell of an oily rag, She Loves it.
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    All I know is that I have been zipping along today on the M1 and 100 to 110kph and averaging in the high 6's l/100k in the Triton. 1650rpm at 100kph in 6th and quiet. I'm liking that. Engine hasn't freed up either yet. Only has 800ks on it. Cheers
    Honestly that's great economy and I'm glad your enjoying it. I think Mitsubishi is probably the most reliable diesel engine on the market, all you have to do is look at pajero and triton who have been 2 of the most reliable vehciles on the market.

    In saying that it does nothing for me. I'd have power over economy any day of the week.

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,888
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101RRS View Post
    .

    The single turbo 4.5 TDV8 only has around the same power and torque as a 2.7 TDv6 - says a lot and the TDV6 is not an overstressed engine - yes it has issues but so does the TDV8.
    Power and torque figures are not everything.
    A good look at the power and torque curves for those two engines,in stock form, will show that they are completely different.
    Different design,different application,installed in completely different types of vehicles.

    Actually its like comparing apples and oranges.

    Even driving the two,as i have done, is completely different,very difficult to compare.
    The basic difference,for a start,one is manual,and the other auto,and on it goes.

    I haven't towed with the 4.5,but have extensively with the 2.7,and it is working pretty hard on the speed limit towing slightly over 3T.

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Power and torque figures are not everything.
    A good look at the power and torque curves for those two engines,in stock form, will show that they are completely different.
    Different design,different application,installed in completely different types of vehicles.

    Actually its like comparing apples and oranges.

    The basic difference,for a start,one is manual,and the other auto,and on it goes.
    Yes they are different - the TDV6 develops at slightly higher revs - but it has a 6 speed gearbox vs a 5 speed so stays on "song" better - and remember the TDV6 also came in a 6 speed manual as well as 6 speed auto.

    I have not towed 3t but in similar configurations the RRS out performed the Toyota on the road and gave a lot better fuel consumption and all the time my brother was bitchin about his lack of power from his ute.

    If your experiences are different - fine - but I stand by my assertion that for a 4.5 litre V8, the single turbo version is pretty lame when the TDV6s paltry 2.7 litres is up there with it and that engine is now low powered compared to modern diesels.

    Interestingly my brother is now towing 3+ tonne and says the 4.5 twin turbo 200 Sahara he now has is poor, so is upgrading to a HSV Chev Silverado.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Power and torque figures are not everything.
    A good look at the power and torque curves for those two engines,in stock form, will show that they are completely different.
    Different design,different application,installed in completely different types of vehicles.

    Actually its like comparing apples and oranges.

    Even driving the two,as i have done, is completely different,very difficult to compare.
    The basic difference,for a start,one is manual,and the other auto,and on it goes.

    I haven't towed with the 4.5,but have extensively with the 2.7,and it is working pretty hard on the speed limit towing slightly over 3T.
    I agree. As a example my petrol v8 makes 500nm at 1600rpm and 560nm at 4400 rpm with 298kw. Mr trout your BIG v8 diesel 4.5 makes 430nm at 1200rpm and 151kw at 3400rpm...

    There's only one big engine in this example, the other is simply a waste of 4 cylinders and 2 liters.

    I also know which one would tow better, work harder, be more reliable and blow unsuspecting P platers away at a set of lights Petrol VS diesel?Petrol VS diesel?Petrol VS diesel?

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,888
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1nando View Post
    I agree. As a example my petrol v8 makes 500nm at 1600rpm and 560nm at 4400 rpm with 298kw. Mr trout your BIG v8 diesel 4.5 makes 430nm at 1200rpm and 151kw at 3400rpm...

    There's only one big engine in this example, the other is simply a waste of 4 cylinders and 2 liters.

    I also know which one would tow better, work harder, be more reliable and blow unsuspecting P platers away at a set of lights Petrol VS diesel?Petrol VS diesel?Petrol VS diesel?

    But we certainly know which one blows the other away into the weeds when it comes to sales,here in Aus

    For whatever reason.

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    But we certainly know which one blows the other away into the weeds when it comes to sales,here in Aus

    For whatever reason.
    Petrol VS diesel? who can't do math, luckily the rest of the world can. Only market in the world. Eg the price difference between my 62 and a 200 diesel will allow me to drive 600,000kms before the extra cost made sense. John cadogan actually mentioned that recently comparing the patrol y62 to the diesel LC in a nissan rant about infinity etc. My liters per hundred are not that much worse, my overall average may be 2-3 liters per hundred more on a combined average since owning it.

    Anyway I'll be in a new 6 cylinder petrol defender again in 2 years Petrol VS diesel?

Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!