Page 357 of 1330 FirstFirst ... 257307347355356357358359367407457857 ... LastLast
Results 3,561 to 3,570 of 13292

Thread: Corona Virus

  1. #3561
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    QLD border restrictions, what it means for business and industry

    https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets...fact-sheet.pdf
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  2. #3562
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    2,661
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    What has that got to do with income tax?

    Under the Constitution it's actually the states that have the power to levy income tax - but they ceded it to the Commonwealth in WW2 as an emergency measure that was then formalised afterwards, and it's remained that way ever since. And it's fascinating that people aren't even aware that used to be the case.

    Ditto for the corporations power - in order to pass the Corporations Act in 2001 the States first had to refer power to the Commonwealth and then enact matching acts.
    Arapiles
    2014 D4 HSE

  3. #3563
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    2,661
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bob10 View Post
    Sorry, I was treating this as if you knew what this border business was all about. You obviously don't, but that's ok, we just have to give you some facts so you can work it out for yourself.

    Border restrictions Direction (No. 5) | Queensland Health

    What is the National cabinet and is it democratic?

    Explainer: what is the national cabinet and is it democratic?


    And the Qld entry pass. [ Think this is still current]

    Queensland Entry Pass | Queensland Government
    Right ... please show me where the Constitution mentions a "national cabinet'? The point of my comment was that there are a lot of current arrangements that don't strictly accord with the Constitution, so people shouldn't be quite so literal about it.
    Arapiles
    2014 D4 HSE

  4. #3564
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,752
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapiles View Post
    Under the Constitution it's actually the states that have the power to levy income tax - but they ceded it to the Commonwealth in WW2 as an emergency measure that was then formalised afterwards, and it's remained that way ever since. And it's fascinating that people aren't even aware that used to be the case.
    Yea, I do know this so, if I do, I'm certain that there will be plenty more people on here that are aware of the fact.

    Anyway, for those of you that like looking at graphics and graphs that supply most of us with knowledge, which at best, enables us to feel sympathy, sadness, amazement, incredibility, anger and self-righteousness, about something in other countries that we have no say in, here's another graphic with lots of pretty lines and colours.

    Graph1.jpg
    'sit bonum tempora volvunt'


  5. #3565
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    NSW and VIC should be concentrating on getting the virus under control in their own states first instead of spending so much time and effort on trying to bully the other States that HAVE managed to get some sort of control in place to open their borders to them.
    Where is the Logic in opening up the rest of Australia to the States with the most cases and deaths that haven't themselves yet managed to stop the spread of this disease.
    Constitutional or not the hard closures on the State borders ARE preventing the spread of this Virus and IS saving lives.
    The snivel libertarians and academics that are arguing about this and are trying to impose their will on the other States need to take a good hard look at themselves then they will realise just how short sighted and selfish they are about this situation.
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  6. #3566
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=Arapiles;3001555]Right ... please show me where the Constitution mentions a "national cabinet'? The point of my comment was that there are a lot of current arrangements that don't strictly accord with the Constitution, so people shouldn't be quite so literal about it.[/QUO

    The National cabinet was really an extension of COAG, the Council of Australian Governments, the peak intergovernmental forum in Australia.

    Though called a cabinet, the national cabinet is technically an intergovernmental forum. The conventions and rules of cabinet, such as cabinet solidarity and the secrecy provisions, do not apply to the national cabinet.Its power is that which the leaders of all Australian jurisdictions bring to negotiate on behalf of their people, and to implement the decisions reached. This model is called executive federalism.
    Advantages of executive federalism in a time of crisis

    In a crisis, decision-making automatically shifts upwards with the expectation that leaders will work together to find a way through the crisis. The National Cabinet meets these expectations in several ways.Timeliness and riskResponse time is critical, and with the national cabinet meeting multiple times a week, issues can be addressed as they emerge. Risk is reduced by bringing together technical and political experts. The national cabinet is supported by the chief medical officers, who meet as the Australian Health Protection and Principles Committee (AHPPC). They pull together the modelling, research and data that form the basis of decisions made by the national cabinet.


    The national cabinet is the mechanism to bring together information and intelligence sharing, and the capacity to pool and test ideas before locking in coordination and jurisdictional capacity. Because of the frequency of meetings, decisions are expected and made. The consideration of different jurisdictional viewpoints and expertise puts rigour and contestability into the decision-making and strengthens the outcome.


    Executive federalism forums such as the national cabinet can be criticised for being undemocratic and unaccountable, with the role of the parliament marginalised. However, these forums are undertaking different roles. The national cabinet deals with negotiation and compromise between states, which recognise difference and diversity. The parliament is about majority will. The connection has not been lost with parliament, which is suspended not pro-rogued, and will be brought back to pass legislation from decisions made by the national cabinet.Once the COVID-19 crisis has passed, the full democratic accountability processes can scrutinise the decisions taken. This includes parliamentary committee investigations and royal commissions. The checks and balances of the democratic constraints on our leaders will reassert themselves.
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  7. #3567
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The National Partnership on COVID -19 response.

    https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/defaul...ovid19-npa.pdf
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  8. #3568
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  9. #3569
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  10. #3570
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Now for the big one. Can States shut their borders, and is it legal? Short answer Yes.


    States are shutting their borders to stop coronavirus. Is that actually allowed?

    the High Court has accepted that a state law may impede the entry into the state of persons, animals or goods that are likely to injure its citizens. These include risks of the transmission of animal and plant diseases and the entry of noxious drugs.

    Current proposals to restrict the movement of people across state borders are clearly for the legitimate purpose of protecting public health. No one could argue that the reason is “protectionist” or simply an objection to residents from other states entering the state.

    But in any case, the High Court would take into account the evidence that the state was relying on and its efforts to calibrate the restrictions appropriately in the circumstances. More extreme risks may justify more extreme measures in limiting interstate intercourse.

    First, any state action must fall within its existing legal powers. These include those under its public health legislation, or it first may need to enact new legislation or make appropriation regulations under existing statutes. If a state is restricting the liberty of its residents, then it needs lawful power to do so.Secondly, while states have extremely broad legislative powers (subject to section 92 of the Constitution), if the law of a state conflicts with a law of the Commonwealth, then section 109 of the Constitution provides that the Commonwealth law prevails and the state law is inoperative to the extent of the inconsistency.

    Overall, despite the constitutional guarantee that intercourse among the states shall be absolutely free, the states retain a degree of latitude to limit border-crossing as long as it is appropriate and to protect public health.


    Section 109 of the Constitution
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109Inconsistency of laws

    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109

    Inconsistency of laws
    When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, thelatter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of theinconsistency, be invalid.


    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

Page 357 of 1330 FirstFirst ... 257307347355356357358359367407457857 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!