Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Shoring up our fuel supply

  1. #1
    DiscoMick Guest

    Shoring up our fuel supply

    Would we pay an extra 1.1 cents a litre for fuel to fund securing the future of our four fuel refineries and building fuel storage?
    I would.

    Federal government open to making Australian motorists pay to keep fuel refineries open | Business | The Guardian

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This is an interesting issue for us. I am not sure whether we should be stockpiling our reserves as just crude oil and refining it here as needed - noting it would not need refining until needed which is a costly exercise to keep non profit making refineries operational. The alternative is to stockpile the fuels needed - petrol, diesel, lubricating oil with no dedicated refineries needed.

    There are argument for and against in both options, but what is common we need to increase our onshore stockpiles and that importing either the crude or refined fuels and lubricants are just as problematic as each other, as the logistic chain from overseas is just as vulnerable.

    Of course if we found more oil reserves so that we were self sufficient then things may be different but that is not going to happen.

    Maybe we should stop all gas exports and change as a nation to having internal combustion engines (including trucks) running on gas and using our oil reserves for lubricants, strategic petrol and diesel - but then our oil is not good for producing heavier oils.

    Whatever, the one thing we do need to do is increase out strategic reserves of fuel and lubricants but how we do this is the question.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #3
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is another and we will be a world class exporter of it soon I suspect


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Westlake ,brisbane
    Posts
    3,922
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So long as the fuel company's are not going to be like the car industry & ping off after the money grab.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,251
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1950landy View Post
    So long as the fuel company's are not going to be like the car industry & ping off after the money grab.
    They will cause governments are stupid and it's not their money. Look at the cash splash going on now which did not stop Quantas switching to a low wage Chinese Party owned baggage co called Swissports did it?

    Swissports is already on welfare in Tas and trying to jeep it that way as long as they can. China Air is getting millions to fly many empty charter flights too..eg for lobster which is not being fished in volume atm due to low prices.

    Meanwhile our useless Govt can't manage to repatriate Aussies from OS.

    Printing money is manna for useless pollies who won't have to live with the consequences...they'll be okay by then on fat pensions etc😐

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    Would we pay an extra 1.1 cents a litre for fuel to fund securing the future of our four fuel refineries and building fuel storage?
    I would.

    Federal government open to making Australian motorists pay to keep fuel refineries open | Business | The Guardian
    No we shouldn't.

    Oil refineries are commercial businesses.

    We pay enough or are gouged enough for the price of fuel.

    Why should we pay out of our pockets again, when the whole idea is for military purposes , not for us the plebians.

  7. #7
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is not primarily for military purposes - it is because a break in the fuel supply pipeline would have the nation crippled in about a month.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,251
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Double post

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Richmond, NSW
    Posts
    1,700
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    No we shouldn't.

    Oil refineries are commercial businesses.

    We pay enough or are gouged enough for the price of fuel.

    Why should we pay out of our pockets again, when the whole idea is for military purposes , not for us the plebians.
    Agree 100%. In NSW in 1985 they introduced an ‘initiative’ called 3x3 whereby we were supposed to pay 3 cents a liter extra for 3 years to go toward road upgrade programs predominantly in the bush. Big blue signs everywhere in the bush with 3x3 on them. I don’t believe this tax was ever removed and just added to the apparent multitude of other taxes that make up what you pay at the bowser!
    Cheers
    Travelrover

    Adventure before Dementia

    2012 Puma 90 - Black
    1999 Td5 110 Ute - White
    1996 Tdi 300 Wagon - White

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    No we shouldn't.

    Oil refineries are commercial businesses.

    We pay enough or are gouged enough for the price of fuel.

    Why should we pay out of our pockets again, when the whole idea is for military purposes , not for us the plebians.
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    It is not primarily for military purposes - it is because a break in the fuel supply pipeline would have the nation crippled in about a month.
    It's actually an international agreement for energy security and something we as a nation haven't met our obligation for a number of years.
    As JD said, we'd be crippled in about a month if there was any break in supply atm.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!